Practice management guidelines for the management of mild traumatic brain injury: The EAST Practice Management Guidelines Work Group
Practice management guidelines for the management of mild traumatic brain injury: The EAST Practice Management Guidelines Work Group
复制标题
DOI:
10.1097/00005373-200111000-00034
复制
发表时间:
2001-11-01
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Salotto, AG
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Cushman, JG;Agarwal, N;Salotto, AG
Mild traumatic brain injury (MTBI), or concussion, is a common cause for admission at trauma centers, particularly those centers admitting primarily blunt trauma victims. Represented by ICD-9-CM codes 850.0–850.9, MTBI may be generally defined as an injury caused by blunt acceleration/deceleration forces which produce a period of unconsciousness for 20 minutes or less and/or brief retrograde amnesia, a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score of 13 to 15, no focal neurologic deficit, no intracranial complications (eg, seizure activity), and normal computed tomography (CT) findings. 1–3 This brief loss of consciousness and/or retrograde amnesia has to be referred to as a transient disturbance of neurologic function and is a sine qua non to the diagnosis of MTBI. Focal neurologic deficits as well as seizure activity fall outside the definition of MTBI in this guideline. Despite the frequency of MTBI, there is no uniform agreement regarding the nature of the illness, the role of a variety of diagnostic tests, or the necessity of acute hospitalization. Neurotrauma textbooks and a large number of review articles have addressed the definition, epidemiology, and clinical characteristics of MTBI. 1–8 Similarly, a number of studies have examined the role of CT9–31 and neuropsychological testing32–46 in the diagnosis and management of MTBI. Several studies, mostly retrospective, suggest which patients might be best served by hospital admission versus evaluation and discharge to home. 9, 47–53 Additional studies exist regarding management strategies in MTBI from the neurosurgeon’s perspective. 17, 28, 31, 54–64 Finally, the complicated and poorly understood issues surrounding posttraumatic and emotional symptoms in patients with MTBI are discussed in several publications. 65–69 From this core of knowledge, recommendations can be made to facilitate a safe, more uniform, and cost-effective approach to the understanding and management of MTBI. 9, 15, 70–72