Communication profiles of two types of gesture using nonverbal persons with severe to profound mental retardation.
Communication profiles of two types of gesture using nonverbal persons with severe to profound mental retardation.
复制标题
使用患有严重至极重度智力障碍的非语言人士的两种手势的交流概况。
DOI：
10.1044/jshr.3402.294
复制
发表时间：
1991
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Etter,R
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
McLean,JE;McLean,LK;Brady,NC;Etter,R
本研究采用结构化沟通抽样程序，测量重度智力落后成人非语言性有意沟通行为的形式和功能特征。4名“接触”受试者（仅使用接触手势进行交流）和4名“远端”受试者（使用远端和接触手势）参与了这项研究。所有的科目产生的通信行为被编码为启动，和所有科目产生的原型命令型的通信行为。然而，接触科目没有产生原型陈述型的通信行为，而所有的远端科目产生了一些原型陈述。远端受试者也比接触受试者产生了更多的修复/重铸行为。其他研究结果包括一种倾向，远端科目以更高的速度进行沟通，发起更多的通信行为，并产生更多的伴随词发声比接触科目。Werner和Kaplan（1984）提出的距离概念是符号化的核心，我们根据这一概念对这些结果进行了讨论。对未来的研究和临床实践的影响也进行了讨论。
A structured communication sampling procedure was used to measure the form and function characteristics of intentional communication acts produced by nonverbal adults with severe mental retardation. Four “contact” subjects (who communicated only with contact gestures) and 4 “distal” subjects (who used distal as well as contact gestures) participated in this study. All subjects produced communication acts that were coded as initiations, and all subjects produced protoimperative-type communication acts. However, contact subjects produced no protodeclarative-type communication acts, whereas all distal subjects produced some protodeclaratives. Distal subjects lso produced significantly more repair/recast acts than did contact subjects. Other findings included a tendency for distal subjects to communicate at a higher rate, to initiate more communication acts, and to produce more accompanying wordlike vocalizations than contact subjects. These results are discussed in light of Werner and Kaplan’s (1984) concept of distancing as central to symbolization. Implications for future research and for clinical practice are also discussed.