Comment on Highly temperature insensitive quantum cascade lasers
Comment on Highly temperature insensitive quantum cascade lasers
复制标题
高温度不敏感量子级联激光器评述
DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
2011
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
D. Boteza
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
D. Boteza
In a recent letter by Bai et al., when discussing the device design for a highly temperature insensitive quantum cascade laser QCL of single-phonon-resonance SPR depopulation scheme of the lower laser level, the authors write the following: “Assuming Boltzmann distribution, the averaged scattering time 34 is proportional to exp E43 − LO /kT , where LO is the LO-phonon energy,” where T is taken to be the lattice temperature. In view of the erratum to Ref. 8 of that letter, the expression provided by Bai et al. for the exponential quantity to which the scattering time 34 is proportional to if carriers are in thermal equilibrium with the lattice is incorrect. While the erratum was published three weeks before the Bai et al. manuscript was accepted for publication, we realize that it might have been overlooked, and thus would like to provide the correct expression. By using the corrected inelastic scattering-rate formula, the expression becomes, exp E43 /kT . Another issue is the validity of the authors’ assumption that for 5.0 m emitting QCLs the carriers are in equilibrium with the lattice temperature. Experimental measurements on 4.8 m emitting, strain-compensated QCLs Ref. 4 have revealed that the electronic temperature of the injector ground state Teg is significantly higher than that of the lattice; that is, the electrons in the injector are hot. In turn, due to the strong coupling between the upper laser level, state ul, and the injector ground state g, the electronic temperature of that state Teul is basically equal to Teg; a fact confirmed by the good agreement we obtained between calculated and experimental T0 values when considering that Teul Teg for 4.6–4.8 m emitting QCLs. Then, by using the corrected Eq. 4 of Ref. 3, the inelastic-scattering rate from the energy state ul to the next higher active-region energy state ul+1 can be written as follows: