CONCEPTUAL MODELS FOR VIEWING MINIMAL BRAIN DYSFUNCTION: DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY AND BEHAVIORAL MODIFICATION
CONCEPTUAL MODELS FOR VIEWING MINIMAL BRAIN DYSFUNCTION: DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY AND BEHAVIORAL MODIFICATION
复制标题
用于观察轻微脑功能障碍的概念模型:发展心理学和行为矫正
DOI:
10.1111/j.1749-6632.1973.tb43161.x
复制
发表时间:
1973
影响因子:
5.2
通讯作者:
F. M. Hewett
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
F. M. Hewett
The child with minimal brain dysfunction (MBD), whose hyperactivity, distractibility, awkwardness, impulsivity, and learning difficulties clearly separate him from his normal age-mates, becomes an intriguing subject for students of human behavior. Although there may be little disagreement that such a child is unique or that he may well have difficulty in the formal school learning situation, a number of differences between theorists and specialists who refer the child’s behavior to contrasting conceptual models are likely to emerge as they describe his problems, explain their origin, and suggest interventions to improve his level of functioning. It thus becomes important for a theorist to consider the eye of the beholder. In this paper, I shall explore representative references emanating from the field of developmental psychology and behavioral modification that are relevant to the problems of the child with MBD. In actuality, the area of my concern can be broadly defined as developmental psychology, since the roots of behavioral modification technology can be traced to the S-R theories of the past several decades that have concerned themselves with the developing child and the environmental variables influencing his development. I shall approach this domain by briefly surveying a variety of references for the behavior of all children, including the MBD child. These references include maturational level, stages of cognitive and personality development, field theory, and levels of competence in the perceptual-motor realm. They also include references that connect strictly developmental approaches to the child’s behavior with references concerned with behavioral learning processes. Finally, they include a referer-ce that is primarily concerned with the learning processes themselves, without focus on developmental levels, stages, or competencies. In my discussion of these references, I shall be particularly concerned with the description that emerges of the child with MBD, the nature of the explanation, if any, provided for the causes of his problem, and the potential of the reference for formulating interventions. is probably the best example of an almost purely maturational theory of child development. It sees the child’s growth and behavior in reference to a time schedule, and although not all maturational sequences can be said to develop at the same rate in all children, the important evidence for maturational processes is their relationship to clear chronological age differences. A number of the characteristics of MBD children who are in elementary school would be far less visible were they to appear in the first two years of life, although problems of degree and frequency might well have set the children apart even then. For example, the 18-month-old is described by Gesell as hyperactive: . . . charged with run-about compulsion . . . he lugs, tugs, dumps, pushes, The work of Gesell and Ilg