Oral Reading, Silent Reading, and Listening Comprehension: a Comparative Study
Oral Reading, Silent Reading, and Listening Comprehension: a Comparative Study
复制标题
口语阅读、默读和听力理解：一项比较研究
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
1978
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Denise B. Elgart
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Denise B. Elgart
理解是通过三种不同的接受模式——口语阅读、默读和听力来实现的。这三种模式的相对有效性已经得到了检验，但由于主体间的差异和阅读材料程度的差异，产生了相互矛盾的结果。本研究的目的是使用一种研究设计来消除这两种错误来源，因为它们会影响三种接收模式的比较-口语阅读，默读，听力理解。45名三年级学生入选。学生们口头阅读，默读，并听了盖茨-麦金蒂阅读理解测试（小学C、中二）的选段。采用重复测量的拉丁方设计进行方差分析。结果表明，三种接收方式之间存在显著差异，口头阅读在理解材料方面明显优于默读。
Comprehension is achieved through three different modes of reception — oral reading, silent reading, and listening. The relative effectiveness of each of the three modes has been examined, but has yielded conflicting results due to intersubject variation and difference in degree of reading materials. The purpose of this study was to use a research design which eliminated those two sources of error as they affect a comparison of the three modes of reception — oral reading, silent reading, listening on comprehension. Forty-five third-grade students were selected. The pupils read orally, read silently, and listened to selections taken from the Gates-MacGinitie Reading Comprehension Test-Primary C, Form 2. An Analysis of Variance using a Latin Square Design with repeated measures was used. Results indicated that there was a significant difference between the three modes of reception with oral reading significantly more effective than silent reading in comprehending material.