Mobilizers and Challengers
Mobilizers and Challengers
复制标题
动员者和挑战者
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
1985
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Thomas R. Rochon
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Thomas R. Rochon
自1918年以来，31个新政党进入荷兰议会，包括目前12个政党中的9个。虽然荷兰选举制度的门槛较低，使新政党相对容易进入议会，但这并不能保证它们继续取得成功。在这里，新党的成功可以通过区分挑战性政党和动员性政党来解释，挑战性政党与一个或多个老牌政党争夺已经动员起来的部分选民，动员性政党试图定义政治问题，在新的基础上产生支持分裂。文章评估了新政党的方案的关键要素，并为最近进入议会，使用调查数据显示，动员政党发展更强的附件之间的选民和享受更长的寿命在议会比挑战性的政党。
Since 1918, thirty-one new parties have entered the Dutch Parliament including nine of the twelve parties currently represented. Although the low threshold of the Dutch electoral system makes it relatively easy for new parties to enter Parliament, it does not guarantee their continued success. New party success is here explained by distinguishing between challenging parties, which contest with one or more established parties for an already-mobilized part of the electorate, and mobilizing parties, which attempt to define political issues that generate support on the basis of a new cleavage. The article evaluates key elements of the programs of new parties and, for recent entrants into Parliament, uses survey data to show that mobilizing parties develop stronger attachments among the electorate and enjoy greater longevity in Parliament than do challenging parties.