Time Course of the Second Morpheme Processing During Spoken Disyllabic Compound Word Recognition in Chinese.

Time Course of the Second Morpheme Processing During Spoken Disyllabic Compound Word Recognition in Chinese.
复制标题

DOI:
10.1044/2018_jslhr-l-17-0344
复制
发表时间:
2018-11
期刊:
Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Wei Shen;Zhao Li;X. Tong
Wei Shen;Zhao Li;X. Tong
中科院分区:
其他
文献类型:
--
作者:
Wei Shen;Zhao Li;X. Tong

文献摘要

相似文献

目的本研究采用眼动技术和印刷体字范式,探讨汉语口语词再认过程中复合词第二词素意义激活的时程。方法在印刷词范式中,受试者被要求听一个口语目标词(例如,“",/da 4fang 1/,慷慨),同时呈现由3个单词组成的视觉显示:语素竞争者(例如,“",/yuan 2xing 2/,circle),它与第二个语素(例如,“",/fang 1/,square);全词竞争者(例如,“",/lin 4se 4/,stiny),其在全词水平上与口语目标词语义相关;以及干扰词,其既不与语素也不与整个目标词语义相关。参与者被要求回答说出的目标词是否在视觉显示器上,并记录他们的眼球运动。结果Logit混合模型分析显示了语素竞争者效应和全词竞争者效应。词素竞争者和全词竞争者都比干扰物吸引了更多的注视。更重要的是,第二语素竞争效应发生在相对较晚的时间窗口(即,1000-1500 ms)与全字竞争者效应(即,200-1000 ms)。结论复合词的第二语素和整词的语义信息在口语词识别中均被激活,第二语素的语义激活先于整词的语义激活。
Purpose This study aimed to investigate the time course of meaning activation of the 2nd morpheme processing of compound words during Chinese spoken word recognition using eye tracking technique with the printed-word paradigm. Method In the printed-word paradigm, participants were instructed to listen to a spoken target word (e.g., "", /da4fang1/, generous) while presented with a visual display composed of 3 words: a morphemic competitor (e.g., "", /yuan2xing2/, circle), which was semantically related to the 2nd morpheme (e.g., "", /fang1/, square) of the spoken target word; a whole-word competitor (e.g., "", /lin4se4/, stingy), which was semantically related to the spoken target word at the whole-word level; and a distractor, which was semantically related to neither the morpheme or the whole target word. Participants were asked to respond whether the spoken target word was on the visual display or not, and their eye movements were recorded. Results The logit mixed-model analysis showed both the morphemic competitor and the whole-word competitor effects. Both the morphemic and whole-word competitors attracted more fixations than the distractor. More importantly, the 2nd-morphemic competitor effect occurred at a relatively later time window (i.e., 1000-1500 ms) compared with the whole-word competitor effect (i.e., 200-1000 ms). Conclusion Findings in this study suggest that semantic information of both the 2nd morpheme and the whole word of a compound was activated in spoken word recognition and that the meaning activation of the 2nd morpheme followed the activation of the whole word.