Congeneric Lantibiotics from Ribosomal In Vivo Peptide Synthesis with Noncanonical Amino Acids
Congeneric Lantibiotics from Ribosomal In Vivo Peptide Synthesis with Noncanonical Amino Acids
复制标题
DOI:
10.1002/anie.201106154
复制
发表时间:
2012-01-01
影响因子:
16.6
通讯作者:
Suessmuth, Roderich D.
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Oldach, Florian;Al Toma, Rashed;Suessmuth, Roderich D.
Ribosomally synthesized peptide antibiotics constitute an important group of secondary metabolites synthesized by bacteria and fungi. Among these are lantibiotics, lanthionine (Lan)-containing bioactive polycyclic peptide antibiotics produced by various Gram-positive bacteria. Lantibiotics exhibit antimicrobial activity against a variety of pathogenic bacteria, for example, Staphylococcus aureus.[1] Subsequent to ribosomal peptide synthesis (RPS) peptides are posttranslationally modified. In the case of lantibiotics the amino acids Ser/Cys and Thr/Cys form the thioether-containing amino acids Lan and MeLan, respectively (Scheme 1).[2] Attempts to broaden the structural diversity of such peptides are limited by the restriction of ribosomal peptide synthesis (RPS) to the set of 20 canonical amino acids (cAAs). While the viability of total synthesis approaches to such peptides, albeit artful, is limited,[3] semisynthetic modifications only with easily accessible functional groups have been exploited, and site-directed mutagenesis approaches have also met with restricted success.[4] Expressed protein ligation (EPL) allows the generation of semisynthetic proteins with an almost unlimited number of noncanonical amino acids (ncAAs).[5] Although the intrinsic limitation that ncAAs are delivered only to the peptide part of the target protein could be overcome, as recently shown by Benkovic and Schultz,[6] the product yields of this procedure are extremely low. In contrast, the residuespecific replacement of amino acids,[7] which generally does not suffer from such drawbacks, is a more promising strategy to achieve efficient chemical diversification by directly translating various ncAAs into bioactive peptides. Recently, possibilities for lanthionine formation in cellfree translation systems (in vitro) have been reported,[8] whereas we, and others, succeeded in the expression of lantibiotics by RPS in Gram-negative Escherichia coli as a heterologous host.[9, 10] This bacterial host is, to date, the most efficient platform for genetic code engineering by which one or more types of ncAAs are cotranslationally incorporated into the target polypeptide sequences.[11] Therefore, it should be possible to employ recombinant expression for theScheme 1. Expansion of the synthetic possibilities for the design of ribosomal peptide antibiotics by an expanded amino acid repertoire. Reprogrammed in vivo synthesis of lantibiotics includes three levels of chemical diversification: 1) cotranslational, by insertion of various ncAAs, including some with unique chemical handles, 2) posttranslational, that is, enzymatic processing and assembly of characteristic lanthionines (Lan, MeLan), and 3) postbiosynthetic, enabling the tailoring of the lantibiotics’ structures by bioorthogonal conjugations under physiological conditions (eg attachment of various ligands such as chromophores and pharmacophores by click chemistry).