Reply to “How should we define the no.3b lesser curvature lymph node?”
Reply to “How should we define the no.3b lesser curvature lymph node?”
复制标题
回复“3b小弯淋巴结如何定义?”
DOI:
10.1007/s10120-016-0678-1
复制
发表时间:
2017
期刊:
影响因子:
7.4
通讯作者:
Udagawa H.
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Shinohara H;Haruta S;Hosogi H;Ohkura Y;Kobayashi N;Mizuno A;Okamura R;Ueno M;Sakai Y;Udagawa H.
We thank Yamashita et al. for responding to our recently published article, in which we showed that the rate of metastasis and the therapeutic index of no. 3b lymph nodes (LNs) were extremely low when the distal tumor border ended in the upper third of the stomach, suggesting that proximal gastrectomy with the exclusion of no. 3b lymphadenectomy could be an indication for treating most advanced gastric cancers localized to the upper third of the stomach [1].Yamashita et al. have concerns regarding the definition of the border between nos. 3a and 3b [2]. In 2011, the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association (JGCA) redefined the no. 3 station by separating it into no. 3a [along the left gastric artery (LGA)] and no. 3b [along the right gastric artery (RGA)] substations [3]. However, as Yamashita et al. pointed out, the border between 3a and 3b is sometimes vague due to anastomosis of the branches of the LGA and the RGA. The LGA usually divides into two branches, an anterior branch distributing to the anterior surface and a posterior branch distributing to the posterior surface of the stomach. In most cases, the posterior branch anastomoses