Model selection and psychological theory: a discussion of the differences between the Akaike information criterion (AIC) and the Bayesian information criterion (BIC).
Model selection and psychological theory: a discussion of the differences between the Akaike information criterion (AIC) and the Bayesian information criterion (BIC).
复制标题
DOI:
10.1037/a0027127
复制
发表时间:
2012-06
影响因子:
7
通讯作者:
Vrieze, Scott I.
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Vrieze, Scott I.
关键词:
This article reviews the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) and the Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC) in model selection and the appraisal of psychological theory. The focus is on latent variable models given their growing use in theory testing and construction. We discuss theoretical statistical results in regression and illustrate more important issues with novel simulations involving latent variable models including factor analysis, latent profile analysis, and factor mixture models. Asymptotically, the BIC is consistent, in that it will select the true model if, among other assumptions, the true model is among the candidate models considered. The AIC is not consistent under these circumstances. When the true model is not in the candidate model set the AIC is effcient, in that it will asymptotically choose whichever model minimizes the mean squared error of prediction/estimation. The BIC is not effcient under these circumstances. Unlike the BIC, the AIC also has a minimax property, in that it can minimize the maximum possible risk in finite sample sizes. In sum, the AIC and BIC have quite different properties that require different assumptions, and applied researchers and methodologists alike will benefit from improved understanding of the asymptotic and finite-sample behavior of these criteria. The ultimate decision to use AIC or BIC depends on many factors, including: the loss function employed, the study's methodological design, the substantive research question, and the notion of a true model and its applicability to the study at hand.
登录
查看更多内容
DOI:
10.1016/s0378-3758(02)00336-1
发表时间:
2003-03-01
影响因子:
0.9
作者:
Berger, JO;Ghosh, JK;Mukhopadhyay, N
通讯作者:
Mukhopadhyay, N
影响因子:
3
作者:
BOZDOGAN, H
通讯作者:
BOZDOGAN, H
影响因子:
6.8
作者:
AKAIKE, H
通讯作者:
AKAIKE, H
影响因子:
4.5
作者:
FOSTER, DP;GEORGE, EI
通讯作者:
GEORGE, EI
DOI:
10.1080/10705510709336744
发表时间:
2007-01-01
影响因子:
6
作者:
Henson, James M.;Reise, Steven P.;Kim, Kevin H.
通讯作者:
Kim, Kevin H.