What Do You Call the Political Upheaval?: The Conceptual Linkage between Revolutions and Coups
What Do You Call the Political Upheaval?: The Conceptual Linkage between Revolutions and Coups
复制标题
你怎么称呼政治动荡？：革命与政变之间的概念联系
DOI：
10.1080/13510347.2023.2190968
复制
发表时间：
2023
期刊：
影响因子：
3.2
通讯作者：
and Masanori Kubota
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Kaori Kushima;Taku Yukawa;Kaoru Hidaka;and Masanori Kubota
政变和革命之间存在什么样的关系？虽然这两种现象通常是分开研究的，但在概念层面上它们之间存在着密切而复杂的关系。由于“革命”比“政变”具有更积极的内涵，政治动荡的组织者和支持者将试图将其定义为“革命”，而被驱逐的领导人和其他反对者将试图将其定义为“政变”，因此，每个参与方根据其政治动机不同，使用这两个标签。基于这种理解，本文将重点关注三种类型的事件——“革命”、“纯粹政变”和“革命政变”——并考虑各种相关行动者——军方、抗议者、被赶下台的领导人、国际行动者和媒体——对如何给这些事件贴上标签的偏好。本文使用新构建的数据集对1975年至2014年间政治动荡的标签进行了测试，并对葡萄牙（1974年）、菲律宾（1986年）和布基纳法索（2014年）进行了案例研究。
What kind of relationship exists between coup d’états and revolutions? Although these two phenomena have conventionally been studied separately, a close and intricate relationship exists between them on a conceptual level. Since “revolution” has a far more positive connotation than “coup,” the organizers and supporters of a political upheaval will attempt to frame it as a “revolution,” while the ousted leader and other opponents will try to frame it as a “coup,” Thus, each involved party uses the two labellings differently in accordance with their political incentives. Based on this understanding, the present article focuses on three types of events – “revolution,” “pure coup,” and “revolutionary coup”– and considers the preferences of various relevant actors –the military, protesters, the ousted leader, international actors, and the media– on how those events are to be labelled. The validity of the argument is tested using a newly constructed dataset on the labelling of political upheavals between 1975 and 2014 and case studies on Portugal (1974), Philippines (1986), and Burkina Faso (2014).