Towards a New Earth and a New Humanity: Nature, Ontology, Politics
Towards a New Earth and a New Humanity: Nature, Ontology, Politics
复制标题
走向新地球和新人类：自然、本体论、政治
DOI：
10.1002/9780470773581.ch10
复制
发表时间：
2008
影响因子：
3.3
通讯作者：
Bruce Braun
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Bruce Braun
大卫·哈维的著作通常与社会理论中空间的重申联系在一起。这在人文学科中尤其如此，自20世纪90年代以来，人文学科在哈维的历史地理唯物主义中发现了一种强大的手段，可以将文化实践“置于”资本主义不断变化的地理环境中（见哈维1989b）。很少有人注意到哈维对大自然的持续兴趣。哈维与太空的联系在很大程度上是有根据的；哈维语料库的许多部分专门处理“社会空间辩证法”——可以说是他对西方马克思主义最重要的贡献——而完全忽略了许多非人类实体，这些实体也是他试图理解的世界的组成部分。因此，布鲁诺·拉图尔（1993）对“现代宪法”的尖锐批评——即认为世界被划分为不同的本体论领域的思维习惯——同样适用于哈维
The writings of David Harvey are commonly associated with the reassertion of space in social theory. This is especially true in the humanities, which since the 1990s have found in Harvey’s historical-geographical materialism a powerful means to ‘situate’cultural practices within capitalism’s changing geographies (see Harvey 1989b). Far less attention has been paid to Harvey’s ongoing interest in nature. This association of Harvey with space is in large measure warranted; many parts of Harvey’s corpus deal exclusively with the ‘socio-spatial dialectic’–arguably his most important contribution to Western Marxism–while ignoring entirely the many non-human entities that are also constitutive of the worlds he seeks to understand. As such, Bruno Latour’s (1993) trenchant critique of the ‘modern Constitution’–that habit of thought that assumes a world divided into distinct ontological domains–applies as readily to Harvey as to any