What Can HCI Learn from Sexual Consent?: A Feminist Process of Embodied Consent for Interactions with Emerging Technologies
What Can HCI Learn from Sexual Consent?: A Feminist Process of Embodied Consent for Interactions with Emerging Technologies
复制标题
人机交互可以从性同意中学到什么？：与新兴技术交互的具体同意的女权主义过程
DOI：
10.1145/3411764.3445107
复制
发表时间：
2021
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
F. Mueller
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Y. Strengers;Jathan Sadowski;Zhuying Li;A. Shimshak;F. Mueller
性同意已经朝着一种“积极热情”的女权主义模式转变，该模式强调同意是一个持续的、自愿的协商和确认过程。本文探讨了这样一种模式如何在人机交互（HCI）研究和设计中，针对与新兴技术的具身交互（这种交互也发生在性互动之外）增进对同意的理解。我们将流行的性同意“FRIES”模型（自愿给予、可撤回、知情、积极热情且明确具体）应用于具身交互的三个领域：1）身体玩乐交互，2）与智能技术的说服性交互，3）与拟人化设备的亲密交互。基于色情玩乐实践，我们提出了一个“TEASE”流程指南（交通灯原则、建立持续对话、事后关怀、安全词以及明确软/硬界限），以推进人机交互中的同意实践并开发实施场景。
Sexual consent has undergone a transformation toward an “enthusiastic” feminist model that emphasizes consent as an ongoing and voluntary process of negotiation and affirmation. This paper considers how such a model can advance understandings of consent in HCI research and design in relation to embodied interactions with emerging technologies that also occur outside of sexual interactions. We apply the popular “FRIES” model of sexual consent (Freely given, Reversible, Informed, Enthusiastic and Specific) to three areas of embodied interaction: 1) bodily-play interactions, 2) persuasive interactions with smart technologies, and 3) intimate interactions with anthropomorphized devices. Based on erotic play practices, we contribute a “TEASE” process guideline (Traffic lights, Establish ongoing dialogue, Aftercare, Safewords, and Explicate soft/hard limits) to advance consensual practice in HCI and develop implementation scenarios.
用户体验不舒服
影响因子：
22.7
作者：
Benford S
通讯作者：
Benford S