Dragons fly, biologists classify: an overview of molecular odonate studies, and our evolutionary understanding of dragonfly and damselfly (Insecta: Odonata) behavior
Dragons fly, biologists classify: an overview of molecular odonate studies, and our evolutionary understanding of dragonfly and damselfly (Insecta: Odonata) behavior
复制标题
DOI：
10.1080/13887890.2011.579538
复制
发表时间：
2011-01-01
影响因子：
0.9
通讯作者：
Ware, Jessica L.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Ballare, Elizabeth F.;Ware, Jessica L.
在昆虫中，也许最受赏识的是那些令人赏心悦目的昆虫：很少有昆虫能像色彩鲜艳的蜻蜓和蜻蜓(昆虫纲：蜻蜓)那样吸引公众的兴趣。这些了不起的昆虫也得到了广泛的研究。在这里，我们回顾了气味系统学的历史，重点是不同研究之间的差异。在过去的一个世纪里，蜻蜓之间的关系被多次重新解释，使用了从翅膀静脉形态到DNA的各种数据。尽管进行了多年的研究，但对于气味分类几乎没有达成一致意见。在这篇综述中，我们从基因和模型选择、最优化标准和数据集完整性等方面比较了齿形动物分子系统发育研究。这些差异与蜻蜓行为的进化有关。
Among insects, perhaps the most appreciated are those that are esthetically pleasing: few capture the interest of the public as much as vibrantly colored dragonflies and damselflies (Insecta: Odonata). These remarkable insects are also extensively studied. Here, we review the history of odonate systematics, with an emphasis on discrepancies among studies. Over the past century, relationships among Odonata have been reinterpreted many times, using a variety of data from wing vein morphology to DNA. Despite years of study, there has been little consensus about odonate taxonomy. In this review, we compare odonate molecular phylogenetic studies with respect to gene and model selection, optimality criterion, and dataset completeness. These differences are discussed in relation to the evolution of dragonfly behavior.