Effect of Colonoscopy Outreach vs Fecal Immunochemical Test Outreach on Colorectal Cancer Screening Completion: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Effect of Colonoscopy Outreach vs Fecal Immunochemical Test Outreach on Colorectal Cancer Screening Completion: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1001/jama.2017.11389
复制
发表时间:
2017-09-05
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Halm EA
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Singal AG;Gupta S;Skinner CS;Ahn C;Santini NO;Agrawal D;Mayorga CA;Murphy C;Tiro JA;McCallister K;Sanders JM;Bishop WP;Loewen AC;Halm EA
Mailed fecal immunochemical test (FIT) outreach is more effective than colonoscopy outreach for increasing 1-time colorectal cancer (CRC) screening, but long-term effectiveness may need repeat testing and timely follow-up for abnormal results. Compare the effectiveness of FIT outreach and colonoscopy outreach to increase completion of the CRC screening process (screening initiation and follow-up) within 3 years. Pragmatic randomized clinical trial from March 2013 to July 2016 among 5999 participants aged 50 to 64 years who were receiving primary care in Parkland Health and Hospital System and were not up to date with CRC screenings. Random assignment to mailed FIT outreach (n = 2400), mailed colonoscopy outreach (n = 2400), or usual care with clinic-based screening (n = 1199). Outreach included processes to promote repeat annual testing for individuals in the FIT outreach group with normal results and completion of diagnostic and screening colonoscopy for those with an abnormal FIT result or assigned to colonoscopy outreach. Primary outcome was screening process completion, defined as adherence to colonoscopy completion, annual testing for a normal FIT result, diagnostic colonoscopy for an abnormal FIT result, or treatment evaluation if CRC was detected. Secondary outcomes included detection of any adenoma or advanced neoplasia (including CRC) and screening-related harms (including bleeding or perforation). All 5999 participants (median age, 56 years; women, 61.9%) were included in the intention-to-screen analyses. Screening process completion was 38.4% in the colonoscopy outreach group, 28.0% in the FIT outreach group, and 10.7% in the usual care group. Compared with the usual care group, between-group differences for completion were higher for both outreach groups, and highest in the colonoscopy outreach group. Compared with usual care, the between-group differences in adenoma and advanced neoplasia detection rates were higher for both outreach groups, and highest in the colonoscopy outreach group. There were no screening-related harms in any groups. Among persons aged 50 to 64 years receiving primary care at a safety-net institution, mailed outreach invitations offering FIT or colonoscopy compared with usual care increased the proportion completing CRC screening process within 3 years. The rate of screening process completion was higher with colonoscopy than FIT outreach. clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01710215
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
--
作者:
Inadomi, John M.;Vijan, Sandeep;Janz, Nancy K.;Fagerlin, Angela;Thomas, Jennifer P.;Lin, Yunghui V.;Munoz, Roxana;Lau, Chim;Somsouk, Ma;El-Nachef, Najwa;Hayward, Rodney A.
通讯作者:
Hayward, Rodney A.
DOI:
10.1158/1055-9965.epi-15-0470
发表时间:
2016-02
期刊:
Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology
影响因子:
--
作者:
Chubak J;Garcia MP;Burnett-Hartman AN;Zheng Y;Corley DA;Halm EA;Singal AG;Klabunde CN;Doubeni CA;Kamineni A;Levin TR;Schottinger JE;Green BB;Quinn VP;Rutter CM;PROSPR consortium
通讯作者:
PROSPR consortium
影响因子:
6.2
作者:
Hawley ST;McQueen A;Bartholomew LK;Greisinger AJ;Coan SP;Myers R;Vernon SW
通讯作者:
Vernon SW
影响因子:
6.2
作者:
Cavanagh, Mary F.;Lane, Dorothy S.;Anderson, Joseph C.
通讯作者:
Anderson, Joseph C.
影响因子:
2.3
作者:
Kahn, Ben;Freeland, Zachary;Singal, Amit G.
通讯作者:
Singal, Amit G.