Reinstatement of causal information during reading.
Reinstatement of causal information during reading.
复制标题
在阅读过程中恢复因果信息。
DOI：
10.1037//0278-7393.19.3.554
复制
发表时间：
1993
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Myers,JL
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Klin,CM;Myers,JL
一个在线的单词命名探针被用来测试是否在文本中出现的信息，然后由几个句子的背景，将被恢复时，SS被要求了解当前处理的动作或事件的原因。实验一中，学生在因果连贯中断后比在中性句后更快地说出一个代表前面提到的原因的探测词。实验2和实验3重复了这一效应，并检验了可能影响恢复原因过程的两个条件：（1）包含原因最初呈现的部分上下文并不是恢复原因所必需的;（2）当原因在文本的前面被否定时，恢复原因并没有得到证明。（PsycInfo数据库记录（c）2016阿帕，保留所有权利）
An on-line word naming probe was used to test whether information presented earlier in a text, and then backgrounded by several sentences, would be reinstated when Ss were required to understand the cause of a currently processed action or event. In Exp 1, Ss named a probe word that represented an earlier-mentioned cause more quickly when it followed a causal coherence break than when it followed a neutral sentence. Exps 2 and 3 replicated this effect and examined 2 conditions that may affect the process of reinstating a cause:(1) inclusion of part of the context in which the cause was originally presented was not necessary to obtain reinstatement of the cause and (2) reinstatement of the cause was not evidenced when it had been disconfirmed earlier in the text.(PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)