Irrelevant speech and irrelevant tones: The relative importance of speech to the irrelevant speech effect
Irrelevant speech and irrelevant tones: The relative importance of speech to the irrelevant speech effect
复制标题
DOI：
10.1037/0278-7393.23.2.472
复制
发表时间：
1997-03-01
影响因子：
2.6
通讯作者：
Wilson, JR
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
LeCompte, DC;Neely, CB;Wilson, JR
不相关的听觉刺激会干扰即时序列记忆。在等电位假说中，D. M. Jones和W. J. Macken（1993）提出了一个有争议的预测，即语音和音调具有同等的破坏性作用。在本研究中，5个实验验证了他们的假设。实验1-4表明，有意义的言语比音调更容易干扰记忆。实验3和4提供了一些证据，表明有意义的言语干扰比无意义的言语干扰更能唤起记忆，而实验4表明，即使是无意义的言语干扰也比音调更能唤起记忆。实验5使用了略有不同的实验程序，结果显示字母比音调更容易干扰记忆。这些结果对一些初级记忆理论和不相关言语效应的影响进行了讨论。
Irrelevant auditory stimuli disrupt immediate serial recall. In the equipotentiality hypothesis, D. M. Jones and W. J. Macken (1993) made the controversial prediction that speech and tones have an equivalent disruptive effect. In the present study, 5 experiments tested their hypothesis. Experiments 1-4 showed that meaningful speech disrupts recall more than do tones. Experiments 3 and 4 provided some evidence that meaningful speech disrupts recall more than does meaningless speech, and Experiment 4 showed that even meaningless speech disrupts recall more than do tones. Using slightly different experimental procedures, Experiment 5 showed that letters disrupt recall more than do tones. Implications of these results for a number of theories of primary memory and the irrelevant speech effect are discussed.