The reception of the church fathers in the West : from the Carolingians to the Maurists
The reception of the church fathers in the West : from the Carolingians to the Maurists
复制标题
西方教父的接待：从加洛林王朝到毛里求斯王朝
DOI：
10.2307/2544826
复制
发表时间：
1999
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
I. Backus
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
M. Wriedt;I. Backus
W. Otten，《传统的质感》《加洛林派神学中教父的角色》J. Werckmeister, <教会法中教父的接待>。e·a·马特，《教父与普通词汇》J.-G。布格罗，《教父和彼得·伦巴第的判决》B. Pranger，“我不知道。”拒绝与接受之间的教父权威：坎特伯雷的安瑟伦、彼得·阿伯拉尔和克莱沃的伯纳德。n·刘易斯，《罗伯特·格罗斯泰斯特和教父们》B. Fleith，《传说的教父来源》。一份研究报告”。J.-G。布格罗，《从经院神学的教父和权威到博纳旺蒂尔》L.J.埃尔德斯，《托马斯·阿奎那和教会之父》。E.L. Saak，《中世纪后期对奥古斯丁的接受》N. Staubach，《完美的回忆》。教父对现代灵修的重要性”。C. Stinger，《意大利文艺复兴时期的学习与教父》。卢瑟福，《格拉提安的训令：意大利文艺复兴时期教父知识的来源》。以蒂莫泰奥·马菲的《在神圣的乡村》（1454）为例。J. den Boeft，《伊拉斯谟和教父》。M. Schulze，《马丁·路德和教父》巴克斯，《慈运理、马丁·布塞和教父》。j·范·奥尔特，《加尔文与教父》。R. Keen, <前三叉戟时期反宗教改革神学的教父>。E. Norelli，“马格德堡世纪早期教会的权威和凯撒·巴罗尼乌斯的教会编年史”。M. Vessey，《拉丁文教父的英文译本，1517-1611》。I. Backus和E.P. Meijering，《加尔文正统教父：教父学术与系统神学》。D. Bertrand，《16、17世纪的耶稣会与教父》。J.L. Quantin，《17和18世纪罗马天主教神学的教父们》。J.L. Quantin，《17和18世纪圣公会神学中的教父》。O. Hurel，《圣毛尔修会的本笃会士和教父们》。
W. Otten, 'The Texture of Tradition. The Role of the Church Fathers in Carolingian Theology'. J. Werckmeister, 'The Reception of the Church Fathers in Canon Law'. E.A. Matter, 'The Church Fathers and the Glossa ordinaria'. J.-G. Bougerol, 'The Church Fathers and the Sentences of Peter Lombard'. B. Pranger, 'Sic et non. Patristic Authority between Refusal and Acceptance: Anselm of Canterbury, Peter Abelard and Bernard of Clairvaux'. N. Lewis, 'Robert Grosseteste and the Church Fathers'. B. Fleith, 'The Patristic sources of the Legenda aurea. A Research Report'. J.-G. Bougerol, 'The Church Fathers and auctoritates in Scholastic Theology to Bonaventure'. L.J. Elders, 'Thomas Aquinas and the Fathers of the Church'. E.L. Saak, 'The Reception of Augustine in the Later Middle Ages'. N. Staubach, 'Memores priscae perfectionis.The Importance of the Church Fathers for Devotio moderna'. C. Stinger, 'Italian Renaissance Learning and the Church Fathers'. D. Rutherford, 'Gratian's Decretum as a source of Patristic Knowledge in the Italian Renaissance. The example of Timoteo Maffei's In sanctam rusticitatem (1454)'. J. den Boeft, 'Erasmus and the Church Fathers'. M. Schulze, 'Martin Luther and the Church Fathers'. I. Backus, 'Ulrich Zwingli, Martin Bucer and the Church Fathers'. J. van Oort, 'Calvin and the Church Fathers'. R. Keen, 'The Fathers in Counter-Reformation Theology in the Pre-Tridentine Period'. E. Norelli, 'The Authority attributed to the Early Church in the Centuries of Magdeburg and in the Ecclesiastical Annals of Caesar Baronius'. M. Vessey, 'English translations of the Latin Fathers, 1517-1611'. I. Backus and E.P. Meijering, 'The Fathers in Calvinist Orthodoxy: Patristic Scholarship and Systematic Theology'. D. Bertrand, 'The Society of Jesus and the Church Fathers in the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Century'. J.L. Quantin, 'The Fathers in Seventeenth and Eighteenth Century Roman Catholic Theology'. J.L. Quantin, 'The Fathers in Seventeenth and Eighteenth century Anglican Theology'. O. Hurel, 'The Benedicts of the Congregation of St. Maur and the Church Fathers'.