Double consonants in English: graphemic, morphological, prosodic and etymological determinants
Double consonants in English: graphemic, morphological, prosodic and etymological determinants
复制标题
英语中的双辅音:字形、形态、韵律和词源决定因素
DOI:
10.1007/s11145-015-9610-z
复制
发表时间:
2016
影响因子:
2.5
通讯作者:
Kristian
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Kristian
What determines consonant doubling in English? This question is pursued by using a large lexical database to establish systematic correlations between spelling, phonology and morphology. The main insights are: Consonant doubling is most regular at morpheme boundaries. It can be described in graphemic terms alone, i.e. without reference to phonology. In monomorphemic words, consonant doubling depends mostly on the word ending. Certain endings correlate with double consonants (e.g. as in ), while others correlate with single consonants (e.g. as in ). What is more, it is the graphemic form of the word ending that determines the presence or absence of double consonants: The word endings <-ic> and <-ick>, for example, are homophonous, but the former almost always occurs with single consonants (e.g. ), the latter with double consonants (e.g. ). That makes graphemic word endings peculiar entities: Like suffixes, they are recurring and they have distributional properties—but unlike suffixes, they have no morphosyntactic or semantic function.