Clinical faculty tracks and academic success at the University of California Medical Schools
Clinical faculty tracks and academic success at the University of California Medical Schools
复制标题
DOI：
10.1097/00001888-200403000-00012
复制
发表时间：
2004-03-01
影响因子：
7.4
通讯作者：
Bertakis, KD
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Howell, LP;Bertakis, KD
目的.描述了五个教师系列的医学院教师在加州大学（UC），系统，他们的标准的进步，相关的挑战，以及不同的方式，他们被每个学校使用。在2001-02年期间，在每个加州大学医学院的学术事务副院长进行了采访的信息，教师在每个学术系列的数量，每个系列的作用，以及与他们相关的问题。每个系列的平均绩效和晋升结果。对1999-2002年在加州大学戴维斯分校医学院进行的研究。两个临床教师系列显示了UC校园中教师数量的最大变化，以及任命和晋升的策略。在临床X系列教师的百分比从8%到39%不等的五个校区。所有校区都同意，临床X系列的教师必须参与应用或翻译临床研究或教育研究，并传播他们的工作。所有校区都要求阶梯排名和驻校教师将大部分时间用于假设驱动的研究。在加州大学戴维斯分校，这两个临床系列的优点和推广行动的批准率最高。阶梯序列有最高的拒绝率的优点和晋升。UC系统中的临床系列在五所医学院的使用不同。任命初级教师系列与最低的期望作为一个“安全的起点”是有利于建设长期教师。所有系列的教师往往在学术审查过程中表现良好，这表明这些系列定义了不同的期望。临床教师的成就越来越多的理解，重视和奖励。
Purpose. To describe the five faculty series for medical school faculty in the University of California (UC), System, their criteria for advancement, associated challenges, and the different ways they are used by each school.Method. During 2001-02, the associate dean for academic affairs at each UC medical school was interviewed for information on the number of faculty in each academic series, the role of each series, and problematic issues associated with them. The averaged merit and promotion results for each series. for 1999-2002 at the University of California, Davis, School of Medicine, were examined.Results. The two clinical faculty series showed the most variability among the UC campuses for number of faculty, and strategy for appointment and advancement. The percentage of faculty in the Clinical X series varied from 8% to 39% at the five campuses. All campuses agreed that faculty in the Clinical X series must participate in applied or translational clinical investigation or educational investigation, and disseminate their work. All campuses required that the Ladder-Rank and In-Residence faculty devote the majority of their time to hypothesis-driven research. At University of California, Davis, the two clinical series had the highest approval rates for merits and promotion actions. The Ladder-Rank series had the highest denial rate for merits and promotion.Conclusions. Clinical series in the UC system are used differently at the five medical schools. Appointing junior faculty in series with minimal expectations as a "safe starting place" is favored for building long-term faculty. Faculty in all series tend to do well in the academic review process, indicating that these series define distinct expectations. Clinical faculty's accomplishments are increasingly understood, valued, and rewarded.