Symbolic or Substantive Policy? Measuring the Extent of Local Commitment to Climate Protection
Symbolic or Substantive Policy? Measuring the Extent of Local Commitment to Climate Protection
复制标题
象征性政策还是实质性政策?
DOI:
10.1068/c09185
复制
发表时间:
2011
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Rachel M. Krause
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Rachel M. Krause
Over 1000 US municipalities have formally committed to reduce their local greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions through participation in one of several climate-protection networks. This has attracted the attention of researchers interested in theories of free riding and local political decision making who question why municipalities become engaged in this global effort. However, whereas joining a climate-protection network or adopting an emissions-reduction goal are relatively low-cost acts, the implementation of such policies entails higher costs. This raises legitimate questions about the extent and type of follow-through made on municipal climate-protection commitments. With this paper I begin to fill in the data gap around municipal climate-protection initiatives and construct an index that quantifies the GHG-reduction policies implemented by local governments. Data informing the index are collected on municipalities in the US state of Indiana and are used to test theories of local political decision making. Findings point to the important role that policy entrepreneurs play in advancing local climate protection as well as to the potential inadequacy of membership in climate-protection organizations as an indicator of increased implementation of GHG-reducing activities.
DOI:
--
发表时间:
--
期刊:
影响因子:
--
作者:
通讯作者:
--