Exploring equity: How equity norms have been applied implicitly and explicitly in transportation research and practice

Exploring equity: How equity norms have been applied implicitly and explicitly in transportation research and practice
复制标题

探索公平:公平规范如何在交通研究和实践中隐式和显式应用

DOI:
10.1016/j.trip.2021.100332
复制
发表时间:
2021
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
J. Kaminsky
J. Kaminsky
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
Elyse O’C. Lewis;D. MacKenzie;J. Kaminsky

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

从定义上讲,公平与正义有关。在社会层面上,公平关乎社会资源的公平分配。因为存在各种各样的公平分配理论,公平考量是多方面的,并创造了一个规范的概念空间,在其中理论可以被考虑、辩论和应用。在过去的几十年里,公平的概念在运输文献中得到了越来越多的关注,在学术期刊和以实践为导向的书籍和报告中都是如此。这些著作在交通融资、投资和服务分配的背景下,含蓄地或明确地提出了各种正义理论。虽然已经提出了明确的规范审查和论点,但对股权理论的隐含应用和不准确的定义在很大程度上混淆和过度简化了这个宽泛的主题。在以西方、美国和欧元为中心的背景下,本文运用社会心理学、哲学和经济学领域的概念和理论来理解和澄清运输领域中的公平概念。
By definition, equity is concerned with justice. On a societal level, equity is concerned with the just distribution of resources in society. Because a wide range of theories of just distribution exist, equity considerations are multifaceted and create a normative conceptual space in which theories can be considered, argued, and applied. In the past few decades, the concept of equity has received increasing attention within the transportation literature, both within academic journals and practice-oriented books and reports. These works present various theories of justice, either implicitly or explicitly, within the context of transportation financing, investments, and service allocations. While explicit normative reviews as well as arguments have been presented, implicit applications and imprecise definitions of equity theories have largely obfuscated and over-simplified this expansive topic. Within a predominantly western, US and euro-centric context, this article uses concepts and theories from the fields of social psychology, philosophy, and economics to understand and clarify the concept of equity within the field of transportation.
DOI: 10.1007/s11116-015-9585-2
发表时间: 2016-05-01
期刊: TRANSPORTATION
影响因子: 4.3
作者:
Lucas, Karen;van Wee, Bert;Maat, Kees
通讯作者: Maat, Kees