Rescuing Peacebuilding? Anthropology and Peace Formation*
Rescuing Peacebuilding? Anthropology and Peace Formation*
复制标题
拯救建设和平？
DOI：
10.1080/13600826.2018.1451828
复制
发表时间：
2018
期刊：
影响因子：
1.6
通讯作者：
Oliver P. Richmond
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Oliver P. Richmond
国际关系和以和平与冲突研究为重点的相关社会科学学科使人们对建设和平和自由形式的和平有了官僚主义的理解。这已经扩展为一种新自由主义类型的国家建设。现在有一个令人印象深刻的国际和平架构，但它在日常情况下与其主体的接触就不那么令人印象深刻了。早先围绕约翰·伯顿和后来的A.J.R.格鲁姆组成的一群冲突研究人员长期以来一直认为，这在一定程度上是因为IR专注于精英权力、解决问题的方法论和实证主义认识论。它未能理解人类社会和机构在和平方面的动力、作用和混合性，也没有理解不平等会导致冲突。将建设和平从新自由主义认识论框架中拯救出来，需要人类学和人种学的敏感性。
International Relations (IR) and related social science disciplines focusing on peace and conflict studies have enabled a bureaucratic understanding of peacebuilding and a liberal form of peace. This has extended into a neoliberal type of statebuilding. There is now an impressive international architecture for peace, but its engagement with its subjects in everyday contexts has been less impressive. An earlier group of conflict researchers, grouped around John Burton and later A.J.R. Groom, have long argued that this is partly because IR has concentrated on elite power, problem-solving methodology and positivist epistemologies. It has failed to understand the dynamics, agency and hybridity of human society and institutions when it comes to peace, or that inequality is conflict inducing. Rescuing peacebuilding from neoliberal epistemological frameworks requires an anthropological and ethnographic sensitivity.
《特大城市存量建筑振兴更新技术培育》作品集SKD项目
DOI：
--
发表时间：
2007
期刊：
影响因子：
--
作者：
上野 淳;須永 修通;他5名
通讯作者：
他5名