What event-related potentials (ERPs) bring to social neuroscience?
What event-related potentials (ERPs) bring to social neuroscience?
复制标题
DOI：
10.1080/17470919.2012.691078
复制
发表时间：
2012-01-01
影响因子：
2
通讯作者：
Moya, Alvaro
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Ibanez, Agustin;Melloni, Margherita;Moya, Alvaro
社会认知神经科学是研究社会心理的神经基础的新兴交叉学科。事件相关电位（ERPs）提供了关于大脑时间动态的精确信息。在这项研究中，我们评估了erp在认知神经科学中的作用，特别是在社会神经科学的新兴领域。首先，我们简要介绍erp技术。随后，我们描述了几个评估知觉、认知和运动加工的ERP成分（P1、N1、N170、顶点正电位、早期后验负性、N2、P2、P3、N400、N400样、晚期正复合体、晚期正电位、P600、错误相关负性、反馈错误相关负性、偶然负变异、准备电位、侧化准备电位、运动电位、再传入电位）。在此基础上，本文介绍了社会神经科学中ERP研究对言语、情绪加工、共情和决策的情境效应。我们概述了erp在社会认知神经科学领域的相关性和应用。我们还介绍了扩展经典ERP研究的重要方法问题，例如颅内记录（iERP）和密集阵列中的源定位以及同时功能磁共振成像记录。此外，本文还讨论了ERP问题评估在神经解剖学领域、生物物理起源和方法问题上可能存在的警告，以及它们与社会神经科学的解释多元化和多层次、情境化和情境化方法的相关性。
Social cognitive neuroscience is a recent interdisciplinary field that studies the neural basis of the social mind. Event-related potentials (ERPs) provide precise information about the time dynamics of the brain. In this study, we assess the role of ERPs in cognitive neuroscience, particularly in the emerging area of social neuroscience. First, we briefly introduce the technique of ERPs. Subsequently, we describe several ERP components (P1, N1, N170, vertex positive potential, early posterior negativity, N2, P2, P3, N400, N400-like, late positive complex, late positive potential, P600, error-related negativity, feedback error-related negativity, contingent negative variation, readiness potential, lateralized readiness potential, motor potential, re-afferent potential) that assess perceptual, cognitive, and motor processing. Then, we introduce ERP studies in social neuroscience on contextual effects on speech, emotional processing, empathy, and decision making. We provide an outline of ERPs' relevance and applications in the field of social cognitive neuroscience. We also introduce important methodological issues that extend classical ERP research, such as intracranial recordings (iERP) and source location in dense arrays and simultaneous functional magnetic resonance imaging recordings. Further, this review discusses possible caveats of the ERP question assessment on neuroanatomical areas, biophysical origin, and methodological problems, and their relevance to explanatory pluralism and multilevel, contextual, and situated approaches to social neuroscience.