Relationships between humans and ungulate prey shape Amur tiger occurrence in a core protected area along the Sino-Russian border
Relationships between humans and ungulate prey shape Amur tiger occurrence in a core protected area along the Sino-Russian border
复制标题
人类与有蹄类猎物之间的关系影响了中俄边境核心保护区东北虎的出现
DOI:
10.1002/ece3.4620
复制
发表时间:
2018
影响因子:
2.6
通讯作者:
Ge Jianping
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Xiao Wenhong;Hebblewhite Mark;Robinson Hugh;Feng Limin;Zhou Bo;Mou Pu;Wang Tianming;Ge Jianping
Large carnivore populations are globally threatened by human impacts. Better protection could benefit carnivores, co‐occurring species, and the ecosystems they inhabit. The relationship between carnivores and humans, however, is not always consistent in areas of high human activities and is often mediated through the effects of humans on their ungulate prey. To test assumptions regarding how prey abundance and humans affect carnivore occurrence, density, and daily activity patterns, we assessed tiger–prey–human spatiotemporal patterns based on camera‐trapping data in Hunchun Nature Reserve, a promising core area for tiger restoration in China. Our study area contained seasonally varying levels of human disturbance in summer and winter. We used N‐mixture models to predict the relative abundance of ungulate prey considering human and environmental covariates. We estimated tiger spatial distribution using occupancy models and models of prey relative abundance from N‐mixture models. Finally, we estimated temporal activity patterns of tigers and prey using kernel density estimates to test for temporal avoidance between tigers, prey, and humans. Our results show that human‐related activities depressed the relative abundance of prey at different scales and in different ways, but across species, the relative abundance of prey directly increased tiger occupancy. Tiger occupancy was strongly positively associated with the relative abundance of sika deer in summer and winter. The crepuscular and nocturnal tigers also apparently synchronized their activity with that of wild boar and roe deer. However, tigers temporally avoided human activity without direct spatial avoidance. Our study supports the effects of humans on tigers through human impacts on prey populations. Conservation efforts may not only target human disturbance on predators, but also on prey to alleviate human–carnivore conflict.