Identifying risk factors for adverse drug events in intensive care unit provides actionable opportunities to customize medication management*.
Identifying risk factors for adverse drug events in intensive care unit provides actionable opportunities to customize medication management*.
复制标题
识别重症监护病房药物不良事件的风险因素为定制药物管理*提供了可行的机会。
DOI:
10.1097/ccm.0b013e31823b96eb
复制
发表时间:
2012
影响因子:
8.8
通讯作者:
Nuckols,TerylK
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Nuckols,TerylK
Dr. Kane-Gill and colleagues provide a contribution to this issue of Critical Care Medicine that identifies which patients are at risk for adverse drug events (ADEs) in intensive care units (ICUs) and which types of drugs are most problematical (1). This advance is important because despite the existence of technological fixes, such as computerized physician order entry, smart intravenous pumps, and barcode systems, medication safety problems have not been solved just yet. Attaining full implementation of safety technologies has been challenging (2, 3), but the main reason that ADEs continue to occur is that they have myriad causes. For example, only a minority are attributable to prescribing or administration errors, and many involve providers neglecting to intervene in a timely manner after adverse medication effects appear (2–4). Therefore, patients benefit from customized management of their medications on an ongoing basis, for instance, through pharmacist participation in bedside rounds (5). In the current article, Dr. Kane-Gill and colleagues provide actionable information that can enhance such customized care by enabling physicians and pharmacists to better-understand the patient-related and drug-related risk factors for ADEs.The patient-related risk factors for ADEs (from the univariate analyses) include acute kidney injury, thrombocytopenia, emergent/urgent admission, and both hospital and ICU lengths of stay. The drug-related risk factors include having a narrow therapeutic index, being protein-bound, being enzyme-inducing, being enzyme-inhibiting, being categorized as high-risk, being administered via the intravenous or oral routes, and being from one five specific classes of drugs. Last, treatment with a large number of drugs is also a risk factor (1). In general, these findings have a high degree of face validity, ie, they are consistent with what one would expect. For the most part, the findings also have construct validity, meaning they are consistent with theoretical precepts. The same authors have explicated such precepts in detail in a previous issue of this Critical Care Medicine (6).