The Online Participation Divide

The Online Participation Divide
复制标题

在线参与鸿沟

DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
2016
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Kaitlin Jennrich
Kaitlin Jennrich
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
E. Hargittai;Kaitlin Jennrich

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

女性、代表性不足的种族和民族群体的成员,以及社会经济地位较低的人,往往会在较低级别的在线对话中做出贡献。这种不平等的参与导致了在许多用户生成的内容平台上某些观点的代表性不足,数亿人每天都在阅读这些内容。此外,随着越来越多的研究依赖来自这类网站的自动生成的日志数据或所谓的“大数据”来研究社会行为,没有参与网站的人的观点也不太可能出现在越来越多的科学研究中,这些研究可能会成为政策干预的基础。
Women, members of underrepresented racial and ethnic groups, and those of lower socioeconomic status tend to contribute to online conversations at lower levels. Such unequal participation then results in the underrepresentation of certain perspectives on the many user-generated content platforms that hundreds of millions of people peruse on a daily basis. Also, as more and more studies rely on automatically generated log data, or so-called “big data,” from such sites to study social behavior, the perspectives of people not participating on sites are also less likely to show up in an increasing number of scientific studies that may then form the basis of policy interventions.