The association between exaggeration in health related science news and academic press releases: retrospective observational study.
The association between exaggeration in health related science news and academic press releases: retrospective observational study.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1136/bmj.g7015
复制
发表时间：
2014-12-09
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Chambers CD
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Sumner P;Vivian-Griffiths S;Boivin J;Williams A;Venetis CA;Davies A;Ogden J;Whelan L;Hughes B;Dalton B;Boy F;Chambers CD
Objective To identify the source (press releases or news) of distortions, exaggerations, or changes to the main conclusions drawn from research that could potentially influence a reader’s health related behaviour. Design Retrospective quantitative content analysis. Setting Journal articles, press releases, and related news, with accompanying simulations. Sample Press releases (n=462) on biomedical and health related science issued by 20 leading UK universities in 2011, alongside their associated peer reviewed research papers and news stories (n=668). Main outcome measures Advice to readers to change behaviour, causal statements drawn from correlational research, and inference to humans from animal research that went beyond those in the associated peer reviewed papers. Results 40% (95% confidence interval 33% to 46%) of the press releases contained exaggerated advice, 33% (26% to 40%) contained exaggerated causal claims, and 36% (28% to 46%) contained exaggerated inference to humans from animal research. When press releases contained such exaggeration, 58% (95% confidence interval 48% to 68%), 81% (70% to 93%), and 86% (77% to 95%) of news stories, respectively, contained similar exaggeration, compared with exaggeration rates of 17% (10% to 24%), 18% (9% to 27%), and 10% (0% to 19%) in news when the press releases were not exaggerated. Odds ratios for each category of analysis were 6.5 (95% confidence interval 3.5 to 12), 20 (7.6 to 51), and 56 (15 to 211). At the same time, there was little evidence that exaggeration in press releases increased the uptake of news. Conclusions Exaggeration in news is strongly associated with exaggeration in press releases. Improving the accuracy of academic press releases could represent a key opportunity for reducing misleading health related news.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
15.8
作者：
van der Worp HB;Howells DW;Sena ES;Porritt MJ;Rewell S;O'Collins V;Macleod MR
通讯作者：
Macleod MR
影响因子：
4.1
作者：
Cooper, Benjamin E. J.;Lee, William E.;Sanders, Thomas A. B.
通讯作者：
Sanders, Thomas A. B.
影响因子：
9
作者：
Brechman JM;Lee CJ;Cappella JN
通讯作者：
Cappella JN
影响因子：
4.1
作者：
Sturgis, P;Allum, N
通讯作者：
Allum, N
影响因子：
39.2
作者：
Woloshin, Steven;Schwartz, Lisa M.;Larson, Robin J.
通讯作者：
Larson, Robin J.