Behavioral evaluation and analysis of a hypertext browser
Behavioral evaluation and analysis of a hypertext browser
复制标题
超文本浏览器的行为评估与分析
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
1989
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
L. Gomez
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
D. Egan;J. Remde;T. Landauer;C. Lochbaum;L. Gomez
学生使用以传统印刷形式或通过文本浏览器“SuperBook”呈现的统计文本执行各种任务（Remde、Gomez 和 Landauer [18]）。使用 SuperBook 的学生比使用传统文本的学生能够正确回答更多的搜索问题，写出更高质量的“开卷”论文，并且更好地回忆某些附带信息。主观评级压倒性地支持SuperBook。对于作者组织文本时没有预料到的问题，SuperBook 的优势似乎特别强大。
Students performed a variety of tasks using a statistics text presented either in conventional printed form or via the text browser “SuperBook” (Remde, Gomez and Landauer [18]). Students using SuperBook answered more search questions correctly, wrote higher quality “open-book” essays, and recalled certain incidental information better than students using the conventional text. Subjective ratings overwhelmingly favored SuperBook. The advantage of SuperBook appears to be particularly strong for questions that are not anticipated by the author's organization of a text.