Effect of a Liver Cancer Education Program on Hepatitis B Screening Among Asian Americans in the Baltimore Washington Metropolitan Area, 2009-2010
Effect of a Liver Cancer Education Program on Hepatitis B Screening Among Asian Americans in the Baltimore Washington Metropolitan Area, 2009-2010
复制标题
DOI:
10.5888/pcd11.130258
复制
发表时间:
2014-02-01
影响因子:
5.5
通讯作者:
Bowie, Janice
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Juon, Hee-Soon;Lee, Sunmin;Bowie, Janice
Introduction Asian Americans have the highest incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), the major form of primary liver cancer, of all ethnic groups in the United States. Chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is the most common cause of HCC, and as many as 1 in 10 foreign-born Asian Americans are chronically infected with HBV. We tested the effectiveness of a culturally tailored liver cancer education program for increasing screening for HBV among Chinese, Korean, and Vietnamese Americans residing in the Baltimore Washington metropolitan area, from November 2009 through June 2010.Methods We used a cluster randomized controlled trial to recruit volunteer participants from community-based organizations (CB0s) in the Baltimore Washington metropolitan area. We selected 877 participants by using a pretest survey. People were eligible to participate if they had not attended a hepatitis B related education program in the past 5 years. The intervention group (n = 441) received a 30-minute educational program, and the control group (n = 436) received an educational brochure. After attending the educational program, the intervention group completed a post-education survey. Six months later, participants in both groups were followed up by telephone. Receipt of HBV screening was the outcome measure.Results Approximately 79% (n = 688) of participants completed the 6-month follow-up telephone survey. Among those who had not had HBV screening at baseline (n = 446), the adjusted odds of self-reported receipt of HBV screening at the 6month follow-up to the educational program were significantly higher for the intervention group than for the control group (odds ratio = 5.13; 95% confidence interval, 3.14-8.39; P