Skintight: An Anatomy of Cosmetic Surgery
Skintight: An Anatomy of Cosmetic Surgery
复制标题
紧身:整容手术的解剖
DOI:
10.1111/j.1540-5931.2009.00726_7.x
复制
发表时间:
2009
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
M. Griffin
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
M. Griffin
1146 Book Reviews‘‘makeover culture’’(80). For Jones,‘‘cosmetic surgery is too complicated... to be analyzed in terms of agency and victimhood, the two most common feminist angles on the technology’’(16). In analyzing makeover culture, Jones demonstrates a feminist response to cosmetic surgery that accepts its practice as part of our modern reality while constructively examining its impact. Jones’ analysis of makeover culture interrogates television shows like Extreme Makeover and other popular representations of cosmetic surgery. Forming the ‘‘mediascape’’of makeover culture, television, print magazines, and Internet sites normalize cosmetic procedures as part of continuous self-care. In an economy of transformation, the labor of selfimprovement is never complete and ‘‘becoming is more desirable than being’’(12). In TV shows like Extreme Makeover,‘‘episodes are about the process of becoming—processes that begin during surgery and then continue through recovery, grooming and further ‘personal growth’in everyday life’’(53). The before/after cosmetic surgery trope becomes an artifact of history as today’s makeover subject is never finished. In makeover culture,‘‘‘after’is the new ‘before,’simply heralding the next portion of labour’’(55). Makeover becomes a perpetual lifestyle rather than a singular event. A useful theoretic tool for various disciplines, Jones’ third chapter outlines actor network theory and its dominant ideologies. Because it accounts for both human and nonhuman actors, actor network theory can reveal how a brand like Botoxt joins an assemblage of doctors, cultural discourses, and human flesh to form cosmetic surgery practice. Dramatically reconceptualizing power dynamics, actor network theory focuses less on which entities hold power and instead on how power is negotiated between actors. In this network economy, for example, the authoritative surgeon is replaced in a schema where ‘‘visual experts are dispersed, no longer holding together in the figure of the doctor’’(73).Part of makeover culture’s ceaseless transformation requires what Jones calls a stretched middle age. While the stretched middle age might be construed as an attempt to perpetuate youth, Jones’ interviewees insist that they are ‘‘redesigning, not denying, their ageing process’’(83). In this continuum of stretched middle age, cosmetic surgery is less about recapturing youth and more about portraying agelessness and demonstrating appropriate self-care. Interviewees report that their surgeries are about ‘‘enhancing the display of