Recall Latencies, Confidence, and Output Positions of True and False Memories: Implications for Recall and Metamemory Theories.
Recall Latencies, Confidence, and Output Positions of True and False Memories: Implications for Recall and Metamemory Theories.
复制标题
回忆延迟、置信度和真假记忆的输出位置：对回忆和元记忆理论的影响。
DOI：
10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.003
复制
发表时间：
2008
影响因子：
4.3
通讯作者：
Jou,Jerwen
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Jou,Jerwen
Recall latency, recall accuracy rate, and recall confidence were examined in free recall as a function of recall output serial position using a modified Deese–Roediger–McDermott paradigm to test a strength-based theory against the dual-retrieval process theory of recall output sequence. The strength theory predicts the item output sequence to be in the descending order of memory strength. The dual-retrieval process theory postulates two phases in a free recall, a first direct access phase in which items are output verbatim in the weakest-to-strongest order (cognitive triage) and a second reconstructive phase in which reconstructed items are output in the strongest-to-weakest order. In four experiments, all three indicators of memory strength (latency, accuracy, and confidence) consistently showed a descending-strength order of recall both for true and false memories. Additionally, false memory was found to be output in two phases and subjects’ confidence judgment of their own memory to be unaccountable by retrieval fluency (recall latency).
