Linking Energy to Health and Productivity in the Built Environment Evaluating the Cost-Benefits of High Performance Building and Community Design for Sustainability, Health and Productivity
Linking Energy to Health and Productivity in the Built Environment Evaluating the Cost-Benefits of High Performance Building and Community Design for Sustainability, Health and Productivity
复制标题
将建筑环境中的能源与健康和生产力联系起来 评估高性能建筑和社区设计对可持续性、健康和生产力的成本效益
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2003
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
R. Hitchcock
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
V. Loftness;V. Hartkopf;B. Gurtekin;R. Hitchcock
虽然越来越多的客户和专业人士致力于在新项目和翻新项目中实现高水平的能源和环境标准，但投资界仍然没有超越第一成本决策。生命周期决策的必要性将取决于多个国家和国际努力，以开发金融算法并收集数据库，展示高性能建筑与能源、环境、健康和生产力效益之间的联系。本文介绍了一个正在开发中的基于Web的生命周期决策支持工具eBIDSDOE，用于高性能建筑构件、系统和整个建筑项目的能源部数据库的成本效益分析。能源部的这个互动工具链接到BIDS™，这是一种建筑投资决策支持工具，由卡内基梅隆大学国家科学基金会/国际建筑研究中心建筑性能中心开发，得到了先进建筑系统集成联盟的支持。成本效益决策支持工具展示了现场案例研究、实验室研究、模拟和其他研究的结果，清楚地展示了工作站、中央系统和整个建筑/LEED设计方法的高质量建筑投资与多种成本效益因素的关系。BIDS™工具在《奥斯汀文件--2002年国际绿色建筑会议的精华》(Loftness And Hartkopf 2002)中发表的《建筑投资决策支持(BIDS)》中有更全面的描述。1.成本、能源和环境质量之间的冲突？有两个争论一直阻碍着美国建筑改善室内环境质量的努力。首先，许多环保人士认为，改善室内环境质量的成本并不更高(图1a)，而许多业主认为，在当今的市场上，不能考虑高性能建筑增加的首次成本。
While an ever increasing number of clients and professionals are committed to achieving high levels of energy and environmental standards in new and retrofit projects, the investment community still has not moved beyond first cost decisionmaking. The need for life cycle decisionmaking will depend on multiple national and international efforts to develop the financial algorithms and collect the databases demonstrating the link between high performance buildings and energy, environmental, health and productivity benefits. This paper introduces eBIDS™, a web-based life cycle decision support tool under development for the cost-benefit analysis of the DOE data base of high performance building components, systems and whole building projects. This DOE interactive tool is linked to BIDS™ - the building investment decision support tool that has been developed by the NSF/IUCRC Center for Building Performance at Carnegie Mellon University, with the support of the Advanced Building Systems Integration Consortium (ABSIC). The cost-benefit decision support tool presents the results of field case studies, laboratory studies, simulation, and other research, clearly demonstrating the relationship of quality building investments for workstation, central system and whole building/ LEED design approaches to multiple cost benefit factors. The BIDS™ tool is more fully described in “Building Investment Decision Support (BIDS)” published in the Austin Papers – the Best of the 2002 International Green Building Conference (Loftness and Hartkopf 2002). 1. CONFLICTS BETWEEN COST, ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY? There are two debates that consistently hamper the drive to improve indoor environmental quality in U.S. buildings. First, many environmentalists argue that improving indoor environmental quality does not cost more (Figure 1a), while many building owners argue that the increased first costs for high performance buildings cannot be considered in today’s market.