Summary of the ONE SOCIETY track > opportunities and challenges
Summary of the ONE SOCIETY track > opportunities and challenges
复制标题
ONE SOCIETY 轨道总结 > 机遇与挑战
DOI：
10.1080/13669877.2023.2197614
复制
发表时间：
2023
影响因子：
5.1
通讯作者：
Frewer L
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Frewer L
本报告总结了由欧洲食品安全局组织的“2022年健康、环境和社会会议”（2002年6月21日至24日;布鲁塞尔和网上）的“一个社会”轨道的主要讨论、结论和建议。“一个社会”的四个主题侧重于风险沟通，社会科学，参与，包括合作，欧盟研究议程和开放科学：更具体地说，它们融入我们对农业食品系统中现有和新出现的食品安全风险的理解，并作为“一个健康”背景的一部分。结论表明，要理解“同一健康”中的食品安全风险，需要与包括公众在内的所有相关行为者合作，共同制定风险评估和研究目标、数据、方法，并将其转化为政策。此外，有效实施开放科学实践和机构间合作是确保政策和治理条件在嵌入“同一健康”概念的跨学科研究环境中得到优化的关键。在主要成果中，“一个社会”轨道明确强调需要：i）实现欧盟的合作食品安全知识生态系统，因为没有一个单一的参与者可以单独掌握复杂程度，ii）始终采用“观众第一”的方法，并使用从科学到决策的参与式格式; iii）投入资源与研究项目建立桥梁;使开放科学成为现实，并成为监管科学的“默认”原则。
This report summarises the main discussions, conclusions and recommendations of the ‘One Society’ track of the ‘ONE – Health, Environment & Society – Conference 2022’ (21st–24thJune 2002; Brussels and online), which was organised by the European Food Safety Authority. The four themes in the One Society track focused on risk communication, social science, engagement, including collaboration, the EU research agenda, and open science: more specifically, their integration into our understanding of existing and emerging food safety risks within agri-food systems, and as part of the ‘One Health’ context. The conclusions suggested that understanding food safety risks within ‘One Health’ requires collaboration and co-production of risk assessment and research objectives, data, methodologies and translation into policy with all interested actors, including the general public. Furthermore, effective implementation of open science practices and inter-agency collaboration are key to ensuring that policy and governance conditions can be optimised within the context of the transdisciplinary research environment in which the ‘One Health’ concept is embedded. Among main outcomes, the ‘One Society’ track clearly highlighted the need to: i) realise the EU’s collaborative food safety knowledge ecosystem, as no single actor can master the level of complexity alone, ii) consistently apply an ‘audience-first’ approach and use participatory formats from science to policymaking; iii) dedicate resources to build bridges with research projects; and iv) make open science a reality and a ‘default’ principle for regulatory science.