Is Planning Useful?: Planning Fallacy of Exam Preparation
Is Planning Useful?: Planning Fallacy of Exam Preparation
复制标题
计划有用吗？：考试准备的计划谬误
DOI：
10.11207/taaos.8.1_159
复制
发表时间：
2019
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
長瀬勝彦
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
伴 正隆;本橋 永至;長谷川 翔平;豊澤 栄治;佐藤 忠彦;里村 卓也;照井 伸彦;里村卓也;山崎修嗣;松田 修;松田 修;吉田 洋;松田修;松田修;吉田洋;吉田洋;松田修;吉田洋;松田修;吉田洋;吉田洋・松田修;伊藤徳正・松田修;吉田洋;吉田 洋;松田 修;吉田 洋;松田修;吉田 洋;長瀬勝彦;松井亮太・長瀬勝彦;長瀬勝彦;長瀬勝彦;千田康介・長瀬勝彦;長瀬勝彦;長瀬勝彦
本研究考察了计划和绩效之间的关系。在研究1中，117名参与者回答了问卷A和B，其余102名参与者回答了问卷B。两名参与者都参加了同一学期的考试。在研究2中，172名参与者回答了问卷C并参加了学期考试。计划者(为学期考试制定计划的参与者)和非计划者(没有为学期考试制定计划的参与者)在学期成绩上没有显著差异。计划备考时间长短与考试成绩呈正相关。此外，备考计划的复杂程度与考试成绩之间存在弱正相关。以前关于计划谬误的研究发现，人们经常低估完成一项任务的时间长度。因此，预计学习时间少于计划时间的参与者会比学习时间长于计划时间的参与者多得多。然而，三组数据中只有一组支持这一假设。
The present studies examined the relationship between planning and performance. In study 1, 117 participants answered the questionnaire A and B, and other 102 participants answered the questionnaire B. Both participants took the same term exam. In study 2, 172 participants responded to the questionnaire C and took the term exam. There was no significant difference in the term scores between planners (participants who made a plan for the term exam) and non-planners (participants who did not make a plan for the term exam). There were positive correlations between the length of planned exam preparation hours and exam scores. Also, there was a weak positive correlation between the complexity of the exam preparation plans and exam scores. Previous studies on planning fallacy found that people frequently underestimate the length of time to complete a task. Accordingly, it was expected that participants who study less than planned hours would be significantly more than participants who study longer than planned hours. However only one of the three data set supported the hypothesis.