Resilience and thriving: Issues, models, and linkages
Resilience and thriving: Issues, models, and linkages
复制标题
DOI：
10.1111/0022-4537.641998064
复制
发表时间：
1998-06-01
影响因子：
3.9
通讯作者：
Carver, CS
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Carver, CS
本文讨论了弹性和蓬勃发展的概念和问题的概念化蓬勃发展的根本区别。蓬勃发展（身体或心理）可能反映了对后续压力源的反应性降低，从后续压力源中恢复更快，或持续更高水平的功能。心理上的繁荣可能反映了技能、知识、信心或人际关系中的安全感的增加。心理上的繁荣与其他成长的例子相似。它可能并不取决于离散的创伤事件或长期创伤的发生，尽管这些事件可能会引发它。一个重要的问题是，为什么有些人茁壮成长，而另一些人则受到损害，给定相同的事件。一个潜在的答案是，自信和掌握能力的差异是自我延续和自我强化的。这一观点表明，许多变量在繁荣中的作用值得进一步研究，包括乐观主义等人格变量，社会支持等背景变量，以及不良事件引发的应对反应等情境变量。
This article addresses distinctions underlying concepts of resilience and thriving and issues in conceptualizing thriving. Thriving (physical or psychological) may reflect decreased reactivity to subsequent stressors, faster recovery from subsequent stressors, or a consistently higher level of functioning. Psychological thriving may reflect gains in skill, knowledge, confidence, or a sense of security in personal relationships. Psychological thriving resembles other instances of growth. It probably does not depend on the occurrence of a discrete traumatic event or longer term trauma, though such events may elicit it. An important question is why some people thrive, whereas others are impaired, given the same event. A potential answer rests on the idea that differences in confidence and mastery are self-perpetuating and self-intensifying. This idea suggests a number of variables whose role in thriving is worth closer study, including personality variables such as optimism, contextual variables such as social support, and situational variables such as the coping reactions elicited by the adverse event.