Securitising Sustainability? Questioning the 'Water, Energy and Food-Security Nexus'

Securitising Sustainability? Questioning the 'Water, Energy and Food-Security Nexus'
复制标题

可持续发展证券化?

DOI:
10.15496/publikation-10575
复制
发表时间:
2015
期刊:
The Malaysian Forester
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
S. Meisch
S. Meisch
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
M. Leese;S. Meisch

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

2011年波恩会议提出的水、能源和粮食安全关系方法强调需要采取综合方法处理水、能源和粮食问题,并将其置于总体安全框架之下。在承认需要在可持续性方面采取紧急解决方案的同时,联系方法同时提出了解决世界人口中最贫困地区需求的规范性主张。然而,仔细研究根本原理和拟议的政策工具就会发现,会议议程的主要范围不是规范性的,而是在安全范式下重新界定分配正义与世界经济需求之间的冲突。通过福柯的视角来解读这一略有转变的观点,我们建议现在将安全作为培育新“绿色”经济的关键机制,而最贫困人口的需求(如果有的话)只是拟议的联系方法的次要影响。
The water, energy and food-security nexus approach put forward by the Bonn2011 Conference highlights the need for an integrative approach towards issues of water, energy and food, and puts them under a general framework of security. While acknowledging the need for urgent solutions in terms of sustainability, the nexus approach, at the same time, makes a normative claim to tackle the needs of the poorest parts of the world population. A closer look at the underlying rationales and proposed policy instruments, however, suggests that the primary scope of the conference proceedings is not a normative one, but one that reframes the conflict between distributional justice and the needs of the world economy under the paradigm of security. Reading this slightly shifted perspective through a Foucauldian lens, we propose that security is now put forward as the key mechanism to foster a new 'green' economy, and that the needs of the poorest are, if anything at all, a secondary effect of the proposed nexus approach.
可能性的政治:超越可能性的风险和安全
DOI: --
发表时间: 2013
期刊: --
影响因子: --
作者:
Amoore, Louise
通讯作者: Amoore, Louise