Bringing the issue back in : Comparing the marketability of the ozone hole and global warming
Bringing the issue back in : Comparing the marketability of the ozone hole and global warming
复制标题
回到这个问题：比较臭氧空洞和全球变暖的市场价值
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
1998
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
S. Ungar
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
S. Ungar
本研究利用偶然的相似性来比较索赔活动和市场化在影响臭氧消耗和全球变暖警告结果方面的作用。虽然全球变暖在不同的公共领域产生了更多的主张，但它始终得到较少的结果。除了在主张、政治机会或修辞策略方面的差异之外，有人认为，一系列因素促成了围绕臭氧消耗而非全球变暖的“热危机”。分析表明，一个问题的轨迹与现行制度选择原则的契合程度决定了它的可售性。
This study takes advantage of fortuitous similarities to compare the role of claimsmaking activities and marketability in affecting the outcomes of warnings about ozone depletion and global warming. While global warming has produced more claimsmaking in different public arenas, it consistently obtains lesser outcomes. In lieu of differences in claimsmaking, political opportunities, or rhetorical strategies, it is suggested that a clustering of factors fostered a “hot crisis” around ozone depletion but not global warming. The analysis suggests that it is the extent to which the trajectory of a problem meshes with the prevailing institutional selection principles that determines how salable it is.