Dancing with disaster: environmental histories, narratives, and ethics for perilous times, by Kate Rigby, Charlottesville and London, University of Virginia Press, 2015, x + 225 pp., $22.50 (paperback), ISBN 978-0-8139-3690-1
Dancing with disaster: environmental histories, narratives, and ethics for perilous times, by Kate Rigby, Charlottesville and London, University of Virginia Press, 2015, x + 225 pp., $22.50 (paperback), ISBN 978-0-8139-3690-1
复制标题
与灾难共舞:危险时期的环境历史、叙述和伦理,凯特·里格比 (Kate Rigby),夏洛茨维尔和伦敦,弗吉尼亚大学出版社,2015 年,x 225 页,22.50 美元(平装本),ISBN 978-0-8139-3690-1
DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
2016
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
L. Squire
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
L. Squire
discusses so that Friedrich’s solitary watcher can seem like a leitmotif of her study. Let me briefly single out two of the examples she discusses: Alexander von Humboldt’s nature essays, Views of Nature (1808), written on the occasion of his great South American journey (1799–1804), frequently feature solitary human subjects that aim to grasp the magnitude of tropical nature and experience a confusion of the senses at the same time. This often happens when Humboldt’s narrator is confronted with visual spectacles such as mirages, which trouble his senses and challenge the ability to interpret a landscape. More than 150 years later, Klaus Kinski, starring as adventurer and Spanish conquistador in Werner Herzog’s films Aguirre, Wrath of God (1972) and Fitzcarraldo (1982), is similarly stunned by gigantic mountain ridges and excessive growth in the South American tropics. Although Kinski is repeatedly seen standing at elevated points in nature, in the end, the character he plays fails to make sense of these landscapes. Herzog’s images reproduce vast landscape sceneries, yet deny a meaningful framing of them. Wilke explores the process through which agency is attributed to landscapes in these artworks. Perhaps most convincing is how she argues against postcolonial criticism of Humboldt’s and Herzog’s tropical panoramas. Instead of revealing the interpretational sovereignty of European subjects over foreign landscapes, Wilke points out how human interaction with the environment is staged as an open-ended, awe-inspiring process in the course of which human subjects start to question their capacity to penetrate a landscape, and the texts or films convey a sense of the natural world as a sphere that exists in its own right. The concept of a peculiar German environmental imagination, in a nutshell, is derived from the notion that German nature literature abounds in nature images ‘that no longer refer as metaphors to a meaningful plane’, leading ‘from an affirmation of agency in form of the scenic display character – attributed to nature scenes in the scientific writings of the explorers and the grand landscapes – to its complete emptying out in modern cinematography’ (208). The great scope in some parts of the analysis section evolves slightly at the expense of depth, but generally it allows Wilke to demonstrate the enduring impact of the dynamics of the sublime across time and media. While Wilke’s book reflects on the ecocritical potential that resides in dynamics of visual perception, it is also an aesthetic experience in itself. Equipped with a very suitable collage-style landscape cover and featuring many multicoloured illustrations of pictures and images that she mentions throughout, it is a beautiful addition to Brill’s Nature, Culture and Literature series.