Varieties of Populist Parties and Party Systems in Europe: From State-of-the-Art to the Application of a Novel Classification Scheme to 66 Parties in 33 Countries
Varieties of Populist Parties and Party Systems in Europe: From State-of-the-Art to the Application of a Novel Classification Scheme to 66 Parties in 33 Countries
复制标题
欧洲民粹主义政党和政党制度的多样性：从最先进的技术到对 33 个国家的 66 个政党应用新颖的分类方案
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2019
影响因子：
2.8
通讯作者：
M. Zulianello
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
M. Zulianello
摘要尽管民粹主义研究呈爆炸式增长，但对民粹主义政党的各种观念以及它们在当代政党制度中所扮演的不同角色的全面分析还很缺乏。为了克服这种局限性，我提供了一个国家的最先进的审查文献的民粹主义政党的分类和民粹主义研究的三个创新性贡献。首先，通过采用一个真正的泛欧洲的角度来涵盖，除了欧盟成员国，通常被忽视的情况下，包括但不限于列支敦士登，俄罗斯，塞尔维亚和乌克兰，这篇评论文章提供了一个经验应用的概念方法，民粹主义，以66个当代政党。其次，它突出了当代政党制度中研究民粹主义政党的常见方法的主要缺陷，这些方法几乎总是将他们视为“挑战者”或“挑战者”。最后，它进一步推动了议程，提供了一个分类和实证概述的三个互动模式的特点，66个民粹主义政党的分析：非一体化，消极的整合和积极的整合。
Abstract Despite the explosion of populism research, there is a shortage of comprehensive analyses of the ideational varieties of populist parties and of the different roles they play in contemporary party systems. In order to overcome such limitations, I provide a state-of-the-art review of the literature on the classification of populist parties and make three innovative contributions to populism research. First, by adopting a truly pan-European perspective to cover, in addition to EU member countries, contexts that are generally overlooked, including but not limited to Liechtenstein, Russia, Serbia and Ukraine, this review article provides an empirical application of the ideational approach to populism to 66 contemporary parties. Second, it highlights the major shortcomings of common approaches to the study of populist parties in contemporary party systems, which almost invariably treat them as ‘challengers’ or ‘outsiders’. Finally, it pushes the agenda further by providing a classification and empirical overview of the three interactive patterns characterizing the 66 populist parties under analysis: non-integration, negative integration and positive integration.