Methoxyresondin: An inappropriate substrate for CYP1A2 in the mouse

Methoxyresondin: An inappropriate substrate for CYP1A2 in the mouse
复制标题

DOI:
10.1016/s0006-2952(98)00241-x
复制
发表时间:
1998-12-15
影响因子:
5.8
通讯作者:
Birnbaum, LS
Birnbaum, LS
中科院分区:
医学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Hamm, JT;Ross, DG;Birnbaum, LS

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

肝微粒体来自Cyp 1a 2(-/-)敲除(KO)和亲代小鼠品系,C57 BL/6 N和129 Sv,用于检查甲氧试卤灵和乙酰苯胺作为CYP 1A 2活性底物的特异性。此外,将每组动物暴露于CYP 1诱导化合物。与预期一致,未处理1a 2 KO小鼠的微粒体不具有免疫可检测的CYP 1A 2蛋白;然而,甲氧基试卤灵-O-脱甲基酶(MROD,25.5 +/- 6.1 pmol/min/mg蛋白)和乙酰苯胺-4-羟基化(ACOH,0.64 +/- 0.04 nmol/min/mg蛋白)活性仍然存在。此外,2,3,7,8-四氯二苯并-p-二恶英(TCDD)诱导1a 2 KO小鼠中的乙氧基试卤灵-O-脱乙基酶(EROD),伴随着MROD活性增加70倍以上。相反,ACOH仅被TCDD诱导2倍。与1a 2基因敲除小鼠一样,暴露于TCDD或2,3,4,7,8-五氯二苯并呋喃(4-PeCDF)的亲本品系显示出大量EROD和MROD诱导,而ACOH活性诱导程度较低。PCB 153(2,2 ',4,4',5,5 '-六氯联苯)导致低水平的EROD和MROD诱导。结果表明,这两种底物都受到非CYP 1A 2来源的代谢,CYP 1A 1活性对甲氧基试卤灵代谢的明显贡献使得MROD不适合区分小鼠中的CYP 1A 1和CYP 1A 2活性。生物化学制药56;12:1657-1660,1998年。(C)1998年爱思唯尔科学公司
Hepatic microsomes derived from Cyp1a2(-/-) knockout (KO) and parental strains of mice, C57BL/6N and 129Sv, were used to examine the specificity of methoxyresorufin and acetanilide as substrates for CYP1A2 activity. In addition, animals from each group were exposed to CYP1-inducing compounds. As expected, microsomes from untreated 1a2 KO mice did not have immunodetectable CYP1A2 protein; however, methoxyresorufin-O-demethylase (MROD, 25.5 +/- 6.1 pmol/min/mg protein) and acetanilide-4-hydroxylation (ACOH, 0.64 +/- 0.04 nmol/min/mg protein) activities were still present. Furthermore, induction of ethoxyresorufin-O-deethylase (EROD) by 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) in 1a2 KO mice was accompanied by a greater than 70-fold increase in MROD activity. In contrast, ACOH was only induced 2-fold by TCDD. As with 1a2 KO mice, the parental strains exposed to TCDD or 2,3,4,7,8-pentachlorodibenzofuran (4-PeCDF) showed substantial EROD and MROD induction, whereas ACOH activity was induced to a lesser degree. PCB153 (2,2',4,4',5,5'-hexachlorobiphenyl) resulted in low levels of both EROD and MROD induction. Results indicate that both substrates are subject to metabolism by non-CYP1A2 sources, and the apparent contribution of CYP1A1 activity to methoxyresorufin metabolism makes MROD unsuitable for differentiating CYP1A1 and CYP1A2 activities in the mouse. BIOCHEM PHARMACOL 56;12:1657-1660, 1998. (C) 1998 Elsevier Science Inc.