Comments on the content of persecutory delusions: Does the definition need clarification?

Comments on the content of persecutory delusions: Does the definition need clarification?
复制标题

DOI:
10.1348/014466500163400
复制
发表时间:
2000-11-01
影响因子:
3.1
通讯作者:
Garety, PA
Garety, PA
中科院分区:
心理学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Freeman, D;Garety, PA

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

基于内容的妄想信念亚型的诊断标准很少成为评论的主题。在这篇文章中,几个有影响力的帐户迫害妄想进行审查,差异和困难,并指出其潜在的影响,认知心理调查进行了讨论。确保研究人员研究类似现象的一种方法是使用比目前可用的更详细的定义,因此提供了一套新的标准。最后,在这一新兴的研究领域的相关方法问题突出。讨论的问题可能会刺激进一步研究的内容妄想信念。
Diagnostic criteria for subtypes of delusional beliefs based upon content have rarely been the subject of comment. In this article, several influential accounts of persecutory delusions are reviewed; differences and difficulties are noted, and their potential effect on cognitive psychological investigations discussed. One method of ensuring that researchers study similar phenomena is to use a more detailed definition than currently available, and therefore a new set of criteria is offered. Finally, related methodological problems in this emerging research area are highlighted. The issues discussed may stimulate further research on the content of delusional beliefs.