Establishing a Global Standard for Wearable Devices in Sport and Exercise Medicine: Perspectives from Academic and Industry Stakeholders.
Establishing a Global Standard for Wearable Devices in Sport and Exercise Medicine: Perspectives from Academic and Industry Stakeholders.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1007/s40279-021-01543-5
复制
发表时间:
2021-11
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Gerstein MB
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Ash GI;Stults-Kolehmainen M;Busa MA;Gaffey AE;Angeloudis K;Muniz-Pardos B;Gregory R;Huggins RA;Redeker NS;Weinzimer SA;Grieco LA;Lyden K;Megally E;Vogiatzis I;Scher L;Zhu X;Baker JS;Brandt C;Businelle MS;Fucito LM;Griggs S;Jarrin R;Mortazavi BJ;Prioleau T;Roberts W;Spanakis EK;Nally LM;Debruyne A;Bachl N;Pigozzi F;Halabchi F;Ramagole DA;Janse van Rensburg DC;Wolfarth B;Fossati C;Rozenstoka S;Tanisawa K;Börjesson M;Casajus JA;Gonzalez-Aguero A;Zelenkova I;Swart J;Gursoy G;Meyerson W;Liu J;Greenbaum D;Pitsiladis YP;Gerstein MB
Millions of consumer sport and fitness wearables (CSFWs) are used worldwide, and millions of datapoints are generated by each device. Moreover, these numbers are rapidly growing, and they contain a heterogeneity of devices, data types, and contexts for data collection. Companies and consumers would benefit from guiding standards on device quality and data formats. To address this growing need, we convened a virtual panel of industry and academic stakeholders, and this manuscript summarizes the outcomes of the discussion. Our objectives were to identify (1) key facilitators of and barriers to participation by CSFW manufacturers in guiding standards and (2) stakeholder priorities. The venues were the Yale Center for Biomedical Data Science Digital Health Monthly Seminar Series (62 participants) and the New England Chapter of the American College of Sports Medicine Annual Meeting (59 participants). In the discussion, stakeholders outlined both facilitators of (e.g., commercial return on investment in device quality, lucrative research partnerships, and transparent and multilevel evaluation of device quality) and barriers (e.g., competitive advantage conflict, lack of flexibility in previously developed devices) to participation in guiding standards. There was general agreement to adopt Keadle et al.’s standard pathway for testing devices (i.e., benchtop, laboratory, field-based, implementation) without consensus on the prioritization of these steps. Overall, there was enthusiasm not to add prescriptive or regulatory steps, but instead create a networking hub that connects companies to consumers and researchers for flexible guidance navigating the heterogeneity, multi-tiered development, dynamicity, and nebulousness of the CSFW field.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
4.3
作者:
Berryhill, Sarah;Morton, Christopher J.;Parthasarathy, Sairam
通讯作者:
Parthasarathy, Sairam
影响因子:
3.1
作者:
Gaffey AE;Jeon S;Conley S;Jacoby D;Ash GI;Yaggi HK;O'Connell M;Linsky SJ;Redeker NS
通讯作者:
Redeker NS
影响因子:
18.4
作者:
Mühlen JM;Stang J;Lykke Skovgaard E;Judice PB;Molina-Garcia P;Johnston W;Sardinha LB;Ortega FB;Caulfield B;Bloch W;Cheng S;Ekelund U;Brønd JC;Grøntved A;Schumann M
通讯作者:
Schumann M
影响因子:
5
作者:
Dueking, Peter;Fuss, Franz Konstantin;Sperlich, Billy
通讯作者:
Sperlich, Billy
影响因子:
2
作者:
Griggs, Stephanie;Redeker, Nancy S.;Grey, Margaret
通讯作者:
Grey, Margaret