The point of no return in vetoing self-initiated movements
The point of no return in vetoing self-initiated movements
复制标题
DOI:
10.1073/pnas.1513569112
复制
发表时间:
2015-12
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
M. Schultze-Kraft;Daniel Birman;M. Rusconi;C. Allefeld;Kai Görgen;Sven Dähne;B. Blankertz;J. Haynes
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
M. Schultze-Kraft;Daniel Birman;M. Rusconi;C. Allefeld;Kai Görgen;Sven Dähne;B. Blankertz;J. Haynes
Significance Many studies have shown that movements are preceded by early brain signals. There has been a debate as to whether subjects can still cancel a movement after onset of these early signals. We tested whether subjects can win a “duel” against a brain–computer interface designed to predict their movements in real time from observations of their EEG activity. Our findings suggest that subjects can exert a “veto” even after onset of this preparatory process. However, the veto has to occur before a point of no return is reached after which participants cannot avoid moving. In humans, spontaneous movements are often preceded by early brain signals. One such signal is the readiness potential (RP) that gradually arises within the last second preceding a movement. An important question is whether people are able to cancel movements after the elicitation of such RPs, and if so until which point in time. Here, subjects played a game where they tried to press a button to earn points in a challenge with a brain–computer interface (BCI) that had been trained to detect their RPs in real time and to emit stop signals. Our data suggest that subjects can still veto a movement even after the onset of the RP. Cancellation of movements was possible if stop signals occurred earlier than 200 ms before movement onset, thus constituting a point of no return.