Typologies of Party Finance Systems: A Comparative Study of How Countries Regulate Party Finance and Their Institutional Foundations.
Typologies of Party Finance Systems: A Comparative Study of How Countries Regulate Party Finance and Their Institutional Foundations.
复制标题
政党财务制度的类型：各国如何监管政党财务及其制度基础的比较研究。
DOI：
10.1089/elj.2018.0493
复制
发表时间：
2019
影响因子：
1.2
通讯作者：
Apollonio,DorieE
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Wiltse,DavidL;LaRaja,RaymondJ;Apollonio,DorieE
本研究对多个国家的政党融资法进行了编目，并确定了与各国选择采用的法律相对应的制度因素。我们利用来自国际来源的数据，评估了120多个州在选举中对金钱监管的差异。我们将国家分为四种类型的政党财务制度沿着两个轴：一个反映了影响政党收入的法规，第二个反映了旨在使政党财务更加透明的规则。我们发现，两个制度因素与政府在融资政治中的监管程度相关：法律的制度类型和比例代表制的使用。我们的研究提供了一个新的概念框架来分类党的融资制度的基础上，各种类型的监管和制度因素和监管程度之间的联系。这种概念类型学提供了一种评估金融体系与政治结果之间关系的方法。
This study catalogues party finance laws in multiple countries and identifies institutional factors that correspond to laws countries choose to adopt. Using data from international sources, we assessed differences in the regulation of money in elections in over 120 states. We classified countries into four types of party finance regimes along two axes: one that reflects regulations affecting party income and a second that reflects rules intended to make party finance more transparent. We found that two institutional factors are associated with the extent of government regulation in financing politics: the type of legal system and the use of proportional representation. Our study provides a new conceptual framework to categorize party finance regimes based on various types of regulations and the linkages between institutional factors and the extent of regulation. This conceptual typology offers a method to assess relationships between finance systems and political outcomes.