Making feedback and post-occupancy evaluation routine 1: A portfolio of feedback techniques
Making feedback and post-occupancy evaluation routine 1: A portfolio of feedback techniques
复制标题
制定反馈和入住后评估例行程序 1：反馈技术组合
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2005
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
A. Leaman
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
B. Bordass;A. Leaman
四十多年前，英国皇家建筑师协会（RIBA）发布了其设计团队运作计划（1963），其中包括M阶段-反馈。尽管如此，设计师，建筑商，有时甚至采购客户并不密切关注他们所创造的建筑的性能。因此，低水平的长期问题往往会持续存在，创新无法达到目标，真正的成功可能会被忽视——即使是在一些最好的建筑中，正如Probe系列的入住后调查所显示的那样。本文讨论了如何将反馈、从设计和施工到使用的跟踪以及使用后评估成为项目交付的自然组成部分，以及如何提高我们建筑的质量和可持续性。它描述了自Probe系列入住后在鼓励使用反馈方面取得的进展，包括既定技术组合，软着陆技术的发展，以及建立一个慈善机构来促进和支持反馈。文中还讨论了一个用户组的测试结果。
Over forty years ago, the Royal Institute of British Architects (RIBA) published its Plan of Work for Design Team Operation (1963), which included Stage M – Feedback. In spite of this, designers, builders and sometimes even procuring clients do not engage closely with the performance of the buildings they have created. Hence, low-level, chronic problems tend to persist, innovations miss their targets, and true successes may be overlooked – even in some of the best buildings, as the Probe series of post-occupancy surveys revealed. This paper discusses how feedback, follow through from design and construction into occupancy, and post-occupancy evaluation could become a natural part of project delivery, and how this could improve the quality and sustainability of our buildings. It describes progress made since the Probe series of post-occupancy ended in encouraging the use of feedback, including a portfolio of established techniques, development of the Soft Landings technique, and setting up a charity to promote and support feedback. The results of tests with a user group are also discussed.