Prophylaxis and remediation of anomia in the semantic and logopenic variants of primary progressive aphasia.
Prophylaxis and remediation of anomia in the semantic and logopenic variants of primary progressive aphasia.
复制标题
预防和治疗原发性进行性失语症的语义和语言减少变异型失语症。
DOI：
10.1080/09602011.2016.1148619
复制
发表时间：
2018
影响因子：
2.7
通讯作者：
Friedman,RhondaB
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Meyer,AaronM;Tippett,DonnaC;Friedman,RhondaB
本研究评估了语音和正字法治疗原发性进行性失语症（分别为svPPA和lvPPA）的语义和词性变异的失语症的疗效。两种治疗疗程均为6个月。治疗刺激包括在基线时始终正确命名的名词（预防项目）和/或在基线时始终错误命名的名词（补救项目）。口头命名的准确性测量训练和未训练的图片样本，以及匹配项目从一个未训练的条件（UC）。还进行了书面命名和场景描述任务。对于所有任务，比较UC和每个治疗条件之间从基线到治疗后1个月的命名准确性变化。这些比较表明，这两种治疗方法都是有效的补救和预防两种变异的失范。此外，对未训练样本的泛化发生在两种子类型中，而项目泛化发生在lvPPA中，任务泛化出现在svPPA中。
This study evaluated the efficacy of phonological and orthographic treatments for anomia in the semantic and logopenic variants of primary progressive aphasia (svPPA and lvPPA, respectively). Both treatments were administered for 6 months. The treatment stimuli consisted of nouns that were consistently named correctly at baseline (prophylaxis items) and/or nouns that were consistently named incorrectly at baseline (remediation items). Oral naming accuracy was measured for trained and untrained picture exemplars, as well as matched items from an untrained condition (UC). Written naming and scene description tasks were also conducted. For all tasks, the change in naming accuracy from baseline to 1 month post-treatment was compared between the UC and each treatment condition. These comparisons indicated that both treatments were effective in the remediation and prophylaxis of anomia in both variants. Furthermore, generalisation to untrained exemplars occurred in both subtypes, whereas item generalisation occurred in lvPPA, and task generalisation was present in svPPA.