Ethics and intentional climate change
Ethics and intentional climate change
复制标题
DOI：
10.1007/bf00142580
复制
发表时间：
1996-07-01
期刊：
影响因子：
4.8
通讯作者：
Jamieson, D
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Jamieson, D
近年来，气候地球工程的理念开始引起越来越多的关注。尽管在 20 世纪 70 年代和 80 年代存在一些关于操纵区域气候的讨论，但这种讨论基本上处于休眠状态。重新唤醒对话的是地球可能正在经历温室引起的全球变暖的可能性，以及为防止这种情况而采取的严肃措施的缺乏。 在本文中，我根据我对正在进行的对话的印象评估了国际刑事法院的道德可接受性。我不是提供冷静的分析，而是提出一种观点。我提出了一系列条件，ICC 项目必须满足这些条件才能在道德上得到允许，并得出结论，这些条件现在尚未得到满足。然而，只要满足某些其他条件，ICC的研究就应该继续进行。我不想这是这个主题的最后一个词，而是第一个词。我希望能够激励其他人思考国际刑事法院的道德规范。
In recent years the idea of geoengineering climate has begun to attract increasing attention. Although there was some discussion of manipulating regional climates throughout the 1970s and 1980s, the discussion was largely dormant. What has reawakened the conversation is the possibility that Earth may be undergoing a greenhouse-induced global warming, and the paucity of serious measures that have been taken to prevent it.In this paper I assess the ethical acceptability of ICC, based on my impressions of the conversation that is now taking place. Rather than offering a dispassionate analysis, I argue for a point of view. I propose a set of conditions that must be satisfied for an ICC project to be morally permissible and conclude that these conditions are not now satisfied. However, research on ICC should go forward so long as certain other conditions are met. I do not intend this to be the last word on the subject, but rather the first word. My hope is that others will be stimulated to think through the ethics of ICC.