A post-liberal peace: Eirenism and the everyday
A post-liberal peace: Eirenism and the everyday
复制标题
后自由主义和平：艾伦主义与日常生活
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2009
影响因子：
3
通讯作者：
Oliver P. Richmond
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Oliver P. Richmond
摘要在冲突后的环境中，“自由和平”正在经历一场日常层面的合法性危机。在许多这样的环境中，不同的群体往往是在当地组成的，认为它在道德上是破产的，受到双重标准的约束，具有强制性和条件性，具有非文化性，对社会福利漠不关心，对其臣民冷漠无情。它与西方和自由主义的国家、机构和观念捆绑在一起，而不是与地方有关。其结果是，它在冷战后基于更解放而不是保守主张的道德资本被挥霍了，其自由社会契约的基本目标也受到了破坏。当然，自9/11事件以来，人们的注意力转移到了其他领域，许多可能很有希望的和平进程已经倒退。这转移了人们对寻求改进、替代方案、混合和平形式或换位战略的注意力，通过这些战略，自由的和平蓝图可能与替代方案共存。然而，从这些战略中，通过建设和平和政策制定的关键研究议程，可能会出现后自由主义和平，在这里被称为爱尔兰人。这开启了一场关于日常“后自由主义和平”和建设和平关键政策的讨论。
Abstract The ‘liberal peace’ is undergoing a crisis of legitimacy at the level of the everyday in post-conflict environments. In many such environments; different groups often locally constituted perceive it to be ethically bankrupt, subject to double standards, coercive and conditional, acultural, unconcerned with social welfare, and unfeeling and insensitive towards its subjects. It is tied to Western and liberal conceptions of the state, to institutions, and not to the local. Its post-Cold War moral capital, based upon its more emancipatory rather than conservative claims, has been squandered as a result, and its basic goal of a liberal social contract undermined. Certainly, since 9/11, attention has been diverted into other areas and many, perhaps promising peace processes have regressed. This has diverted attention away from a search for refinements, alternatives, for hybrid forms of peace, or for empathetic strategies through which the liberal blueprint for peace might coexist with alternatives. Yet from these strategies a post-liberal peace might emerge via critical research agendas for peacebuilding and for policymaking, termed here, eirenist. This opens up a discussion of an everyday ‘post-liberal peace’ and critical policies for peacebuilding.