SITUATIONAL COPING AND COPING DISPOSITIONS IN A STRESSFUL TRANSACTION
SITUATIONAL COPING AND COPING DISPOSITIONS IN A STRESSFUL TRANSACTION
复制标题
DOI：
10.1037/0022-3514.66.1.184
复制
发表时间：
1994-01-01
影响因子：
7.6
通讯作者：
SCHEIER, ME
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
CARVER, CS;SCHEIER, ME
在报告了性格应对方式后，学生们在考试前2天、考试后但成绩公布前和成绩公布后报告了情境应对和4类影响（来自威胁、挑战、伤害和受益评估）。应对并不能预测未来的痛苦水平较低;事实上，一些应对似乎会引起威胁感。考试前的伤害感导致了考试后的几种应对方式，大多数是功能失调的。对一个人的成绩的信心是一个更好的预测情绪比应对。在大多数情况下，性格应对可以预测低-中度水平的类似情境应对。然而，应对倾向并不能可靠地预测情绪，但有以下例外：倾向性否认与威胁有关，倾向性使用社会支持;倾向性使用酒精与威胁和伤害有关。
After reporting dispositional coping styles, students reported situational coping and 4 classes of affect (from threat, challenge, harm, and benefit appraisals) 2 days before an exam, after the exam but before grades were posted, and after posting of grades. Coping did not predict lower levels of future distress; indeed, some coping seemed to induce feelings of threat. Feelings of harm before the exam induced several kinds of coping after the exam, mostly dysfunctional. Confidence about one's grade was a better predictor of emotions throughout than was coping. Dispositional coping predicted comparable situational coping at low-moderate levels in most cases. Coping dispositions did not reliably predict emotions, however, with these exceptions: Dispositional denial was related to threat, as was dispositional use of social support; dispositional use of alcohol was related to both threat and harm.